Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03983-03
Original file (03983-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  F O R C O R R E C T l O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S  

2  NAVY  ANNEX 

W A S H I N G T O N  D C   20370-5100 

JRE 
Docket No. 03983-03 
14 Qctober 2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the 
United States Code, section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 9 October 2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted 
of your application, together with all material submitted in 
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, 
regulations and policies. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice. 

The Board found that you served on active duty in the' Navy for 
17 days, from 15 June to 1 July 1999, when you were discharged 
by reason of erroneous entry.  You were assigned a reentry code 
of RE-4, as permitted by regulations.  The Board rejected your 
contention to the effect that your reentry code is unjust 
because your "recruiter failed to list childhood ADHIY'  which you 
"never took medication for".  Your contention is belied by 
available records, which indicate that you concealed your 
history of attention deficit disorder," as well as your extended 
use of Ritalin and Zoloft, when being processed for enlistment. 

The Board concluded that your reentry code was properly 
assigned, and that there is no basis for correcting your record 
to show that you received a more favorable code.  Accordingly, 
your application has been denied.  The names and votes of the 
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are sach 
that favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have 
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and 
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by 
the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that 
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official 
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerelv, 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04223-03

    Original file (04223-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05617-02

    Original file (05617-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you were deemed to be financially irresponsible, the Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00889-03

    Original file (00889-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the time...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07776-02

    Original file (07776-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 10 February ahd 3 March 2003, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Personnel Programs) letter dated 21 June 2002, Subject: Complaint of Wrongs under Article 138, UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice), and the memorandum for the record dated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08527-02

    Original file (08527-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on your statement, on 18 August 1994 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of your homosexuality.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03072-03

    Original file (03072-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05894-03

    Original file (05894-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2003. 'service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly assigned. It is also noted that on March 22, 1994 he signed an official service record book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03070-03

    Original file (03070-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 103 ly VgbY REFER TO: MMER/RE R M E W 0 7 2003 Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF F O NAVAL RECORDS MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 1. - service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02761-03

    Original file (02761-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 28 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05703-03

    Original file (05703-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It noted that you did not complain of any of the hallmark symptoms of that disorder during your Navy service, or for many years thereafter, and there is no indication in your Navy record that you were suffering from a significant mental disorder prior to your discharge. Consequently, when...