Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02796-03
Original file (02796-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

FC
Docket No. 02796-03
27 October 2003

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

RD OF

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(b) BUPERSINT 1900.8
(1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

From:
To:
Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board
requesting that his naval record be corrected to show a more
favorable reenlistment code.

Board, consisting of Mr.
, reviewed Petitioner's a

and MR.
injustice
on 22 October 2003, and, pursuant to its regulations determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes,
3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

regulations and policies.

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although Petitioner's application was not filed in a
timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statue of limitations and review the application on its merits.
Petitioner enlisted in the Naval Reserve and commenced
twenty four months of active duty on 9 February 1992 at age 24.
He served without incident until he was honorably released from
8 February 1994.
active duty on 
reenlistment code was assigned.

At that time, an RE-4

C .

d.

On 8 February 1994, Petitioner received a separation

performance evaluation.
an outstanding 4.0.
strongly recommended for advancement and retention.

In the narrative comments, Petitioner was

The overall performance mark average was

e.

Reference 

(b) authorizes the assignment of an

reenlistment code of RE-7 to a Naval Reservist who completes an
initial twenty-four month period of active duty.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action due to the fact that he was recommended for advancement
and retention on his separation evaluation, and especially the
absence of documented legal problems or adverse comments in his
Accordingly, the record should be corrected to
service record.
show a reenlistment code of RE-7 vice the reenlistment code of
RE-4 actually assigned.
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
8aFebruary 1994, Petitioner was assigned an RE-7 reenlistment

on 
code vice the RE-4 code actually assigned on that date.

b.

That any material or entries inconsistent with or

relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

C .

That any material directed to be removed from

Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with
a copy of the this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for  that purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

ROBERT D.  
Recorder

ZSALMAN

Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6
(e) of the revised Procedures of the board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00353-03

    Original file (00353-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (b) OPNAVINST 1160.5C (c) BUPERSINST 1900.8 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. applied to this Board requesting enlisted member of the Navy, that his naval record be corrected to show a reenlistment code that would allow him to reenlist instead of the RE-4 code issued at the time of his separation on 3 March 1995. d. Petitioner served without incident while on active duty and was released from active duty...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 08708-03

    Original file (08708-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable reenlistment code.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on4 Augustl 2004, and, pursuant to its regulations determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Reference (b) authorizes the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08686-02

    Original file (08686-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 6 April 2001. Individuals separated for this reason may receive a reenlistment code of RE-R1, RE-1, or RE-4. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 6 April 2001 he was issued an honorable discharge by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07531-05

    Original file (07531-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2. Reference (b) authorizes the issuance of an RE-4 reenlistment code to Sailors who have completed their enlistment and are serving in paygrade E-4 at the time of their release from active duty. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-i reenlistment code on 15 September...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05400-08

    Original file (05400-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Reference (b) authorizes an RE-1 reenlistment code for a Sailor, such as Petitioner, who was recommended for advancement and retention at the time of his/her release from active duty. The Board believes that the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned at the time of Petitioner’s release from active duty was an error and that the nonrecommendation for reenlistment at the time of her discharge was based solely on this error. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07180-05

    Original file (07180-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marines Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board, consisting of Mr Mr and Mr reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The reenlistment code of RE-4 means that Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12438-10

    Original file (12438-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TOR Docket No: 12438-10 7 July 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD oF iii] E -¥ : : Ref: fa) 1060 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his RE-4 (nonrecommendation for retention) reenlistment code...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05129-08

    Original file (05129-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board also finds that the service record entry dated 3 September 2003, does not justify assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code since the record shows that the last administrative action regarding his rank was a promotion to pay grade E-3 and not a reduction. Therefore, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code on 3 October 2003, and that he was recommended for retention on 22 October 2007. That Petitioner's naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08262-01

    Original file (08262-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show an honorable discharge and an RE-1 reenlistment code. He refused Captain's Mast The Board met on 17 The performance evaluation Petitioner received from the TEMDU command, for the period 24 April to 24 November 2000, is also...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10126-02

    Original file (10126-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS I 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 FC Document No: 10126- 02 28 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: EVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF iUmUINII~IIflIfhIhIIIIEUiIIiihhjUIhii~iiqimU~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Petitioner’s conduct and overall trait averages were 3.25 and 3.2 respectively at the time of his discharge. Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form...