Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00353-03
Original file (00353-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

FC
Docket No. 00353-03
9 June 2003

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(b) OPNAVINST 
1160.5C
(c) BUPERSINST 1900.8

Encl:

(1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an
1.
applied to this Board requesting
enlisted member of the Navy,
that his naval record be corrected to show a reenlistment code
that would allow him to reenlist instead of the RE-4 code issued
at the time of his separation on 3 March 1995.

The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Haney, and Ms.

2.
LeBlanc, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 4 June 2003, and, pursuant to its regulations determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that Petitioner's application to the
Board was not filed in a timely manner, it is in the interest of
justice to waiver the statue of limitations and review the
application on its merits.

C .

Petitioner enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 31 August

1992 at age 21. On 4 November 1992, he reported for 24 months of
On 4 November 1994, Petitioner extended his active
active duty.
duty obligation for four months.
duty, Petitioner was advanced only to  

During his period of active

paygrade E-2.

d.

Petitioner served without incident while on active duty

and was released from active duty with an honorable
characterization of service and assigned a reenlistment code of
RE-4 on 3 March 1995.

e.

During his two years and four months of active duty,

Petitioner attained conduct and overall trait averages of 3.4 and
Further, he was recommend for advancement and
3.5, respectively.
retention on both performance evaluations.

f.

Reference (b) requires the issuance of an RE-4

reenlistment code to individuals who have completed their
enlistment and are serving in paygrades E-l or E-2 at the time of
However, reference (c)
their release from active duty.
authorizes an RE-7 reenlistment code for an individual  
Petitioner who satisfactorily completes a two-year period of
active duty In the Naval Reserve.

such.as

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action due to his satisfactory performance evaluations that
clearly state he was recommended for retention and advancement,
and especially considering the absence of documented legal
problems or adverse comments in his service record.
the record should be corrected to show a reenlistment code of  
7 vice the reenlistment code of RE-4 actually assigned.

Accordingly,
RE-

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that

Petitioner was assigned an RE-7 reenlistment code vice the RE-4
code actually assigned on 3 March 1995.

b.

That any material or entries inconsistent with or

relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

C .

That any material directed to be removed from

Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with
a copy of the this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for that purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

P/k&

Acting Recorder

.

5 . Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6
(e) of the revised Procedures of the board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 08708-03

    Original file (08708-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable reenlistment code.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on4 Augustl 2004, and, pursuant to its regulations determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Reference (b) authorizes the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02668-06

    Original file (02668-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2 The Board, consisting of Messrs andreviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Petitioner’s separation performance evaluation for the period...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08516-07

    Original file (08516-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 08516-07 17 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF él Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record -1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07531-05

    Original file (07531-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2. Reference (b) authorizes the issuance of an RE-4 reenlistment code to Sailors who have completed their enlistment and are serving in paygrade E-4 at the time of their release from active duty. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-i reenlistment code on 15 September...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11022-10

    Original file (11022-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 11022-10 28 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tor Secretary of the Navy subs REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1¢0 (9 Ref: (a) 10 U.8.€. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. ae......

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4679 13

    Original file (NR4679 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code, which was issued on 13 April 2013. At that time he was recommended for promotion and continued service in the Navy Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 reentry code. Such a code may also be assigned if the commanding officer does not recommend the individual for reenlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02796-03

    Original file (02796-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (b) BUPERSINT 1900.8 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable reenlistment code. In the narrative comments, Petitioner was The overall performance mark average was e. Reference (b) authorizes the assignment of an reenlistment code of RE-7 to a Naval Reservist who...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05400-08

    Original file (05400-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Reference (b) authorizes an RE-1 reenlistment code for a Sailor, such as Petitioner, who was recommended for advancement and retention at the time of his/her release from active duty. The Board believes that the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned at the time of Petitioner’s release from active duty was an error and that the nonrecommendation for reenlistment at the time of her discharge was based solely on this error. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09474-05

    Original file (09474-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code. He now requests a change in his reenlistment code so he can apply to the active guard and reserve.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03652-10

    Original file (03652-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting recharacterization oO change of his narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code, and removal of all derogatory material from his record. On record reflects satisfactory parti med to be his failure to 16 July 2002, after what was presu continue participating in drills, an attempt was made, via mail, to notify him of pending...