Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02626-03
Original file (02626-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                            2 NAVY ANNEX
         WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                                                                                          JLP: ddj
                                                                                          Docket No: 2625-03
                                                                                          26 August 2003







This is in reference to your provisions of title 10 of the application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Commander, Naval Resreve Force memorandum 1000 Ser Ni 1/114 of 7 July 2003, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,






Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORCE
4400 DAUPHINE STREET
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70146-5046

IN REPLY REFER TO:
Ser N11/114
JUL 2003
From:    Commander, Naval Reserve Force
To:      Commander, Navy Personnel Command (Pers-8l2)

Subj:    REQUEST ADVANCEMNT TO E-5 ICO

Ref:     (a) COMNAVRESCRUITCOMINST 1133. 1E

1.       Forwarded, recommending disapproval. Per reference a, members with excessive breaks in service do not qualify for assessment into the Naval Reserve at higher paygrades.

2.       Point of contact is HTCS(SW) at commercial       or DSN 678-5308.

By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09699-08

    Original file (09699-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references {a} through (c), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06634-01

    Original file (06634-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06334-03

    Original file (06334-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to have the SRB payment readjusted to reflect the 4.0 award level for the Diver NEC 5342.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03611-04

    Original file (03611-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. A Career Status Bonus (CSB) GENADMIN Notification message was released to member on 26 September 2001 offering him the opportunity to elect the REDUX retired pay system and receive a $30,000 CSB by his 15th anniversary of active duty. The member’s CSB GENADMIN notification messages as well as NAVADMIN 245 01 nd NAVADMIN 344/702 clearly notified him...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05690-02

    Original file (05690-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03

    Original file (06337-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07398-03

    Original file (07398-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You reenlisted on 22 April 1999, after the date establishing the Selected Reserve Bonus Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08601-02

    Original file (08601-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. (N132) and SNM was Paygrade earned while in the Per enclosure (1) paygrade (b), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08767-02

    Original file (08767-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 8767-02 14 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06882-02

    Original file (06882-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32 copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...