DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 02489-03
11 September 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 September 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
advisory opinion furnished by Commandant of the Marine Corps
dated 8 August 2003, a copy of which is attached.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
In addition, the Board considered the
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will
request.
denied.
be furnished upon
In this connection,
the Board substantially
It is regretted that the circumstances
of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon
submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
it is important to keep in mind that
In this regard,
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive D
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE
CORP S
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y
3280 RUSSELL
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
ROA D
22 134-S 103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1040
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
Encl:
BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER
UBJ: RECODE
(1) NAVMC
(2) SF 600 of 12 Nov 02
118(11)
ervice record has been reviewed and it has
1.
been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly
assigned.
The reenlistment code was assigned based on his
overall record and simply means that he failed to complete
recruit training.
was separated on November 25, 2002 by reason
2.
of Entry Level Performance and Conduct.
A review of his service
record indicates that he was counseled concerning his inability
to adapt to the military environment,
and not being recommended
for reenlistment due to suicidal ideations.
It is also noted
that on November 19, 2002 he signed an official service record
book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment
code.
Personality Disorder with borderline and antisocial traits.
Enclosures
It is further noted that he was diagnosed with a
(1) and
(2) pertain.
After a review of all relevant
3.
infor
concurs in the professional evaluation o
fications for reenlistment at the time of separation.
Once
a code is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or
upgraded as a result of events that occur after separation or
based merely on the passage of time.
quarters
quali-
Head, Performance Evaluation
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
bf the Marine Corps
-
DATE
.
ADMlN!STRATlVEREMARKS(1070)
OATE .
Articles UCMJ
reqlrlred by Article 137.
explamed to me this date as
UCMJ.
-tnabllity to adapt to mil-
MARCORSEPMAN
concerning my
Counselling included
itary environment,
advice and methods to overcome my perform-
ance and conduct deficiencies.
further advised
thst continued substandard
performance and conduct could result in
admtnistrative separation.
COPY o f
I was
__
I have been counseled and understand
an not recommended for Reenlistment and
have been assigned Reenlistment Code
RX-32’ by reason of Entry Level Performance
-Conduct :
X
+ Failure to Adapt to Marine Corps
I
Envix?onmenr. SUICIDAL IDEATIONS
Z’ailure to Expend Reasonable Effort
_
.
IncapabSlity to Perform
Training
I certif
y that I have been counseled this
date regarding the automatic continuation
of
release
of SGLX to a civilian policy,
SGLI for a period of 120 days after
fxom. active duty and conversion
MCRD
SDlego CA
MCRD
SDiego CA
R’i%
SptBn
I understand that dependent ID cards issued
to’my dependents
expire on the date of my
release.
to the nearest Military Authority as soon
as possible.
w ill surrender all such cards
X
I certify that I have been counseled this
date concerning the provisions of the
14ontgowery
GI Bill relating to my discharge.
.
$50;00
counseled and under-
I certify I have been
stand that the minimum of
I am
required’to.hav,e on m y date of discharge
includes any monies I have in my direct
deposit account at Marine
Credit Union.
understand that no further payment will be
made to me up
Should I have that amount, I
Corps West Federal
Enclosure
(2)
1
7s4&w-0M-4176
NSN
HbLTH RECORD
.
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD OF MEDICAL CARE
AUTHORIZED
FOR
mcAl.
REPrIoowmN
WONSOR’B NAME
-
SSNID NO.
Defo
ol
Birth:
Renk/GraduJ
.
____,_
.._
CHAONOLOGICAC RECORD OF MEDICAL. CARE
Medical
Record
STANDARD FORM 600 (REV.
Prescribed by GSA and
FIRMR (41
ICMR
CW) 201-0.202-l
6-97)
USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00404
MD03-00404 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030109. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The porpoise of this letter is to ask you (the Board) to consider in changing my reason of my discharge from the United States Marine Corps in 1998.
USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00408
The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. LEGION):“On behalf of the above referenced applicant, and in accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166; SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the following informal comments; and/or issue(s). This case is now respectfully submitted to the Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03934-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 27 April 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03424-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 15 April 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08348-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navai record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 3. after a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters concurs in the professional evaluation of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05894-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2003. 'service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly assigned. It is also noted that on March 22, 1994 he signed an official service record book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02084-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600247
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). MHU diagnosed SNR with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (EPTE). Based on the Applicant’s issue, namely that he “made up stories” in order to be discharged, the Board reviewed the Applicant’s record to determine whether the Applicant’s narrative reason for separation should be changed.
USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01405
MD03-01405 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030819. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions and that the RE Code be changed. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than three months in the military to warrant a change of discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03432-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 9 May 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...