Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00375-03
Original file (00375-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 375-03
19 August 2003

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY  

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)
(3)

DD Form 149 w/attachments
Series of Documents
Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect,
corrected to show advanced when first eligible.

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
that the applicable naval record be

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s
allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. After reviewing the correspondence attached as enclosure 

(2), the Board concluded

that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure 
following corrective action.

(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

Docket No: 375-03

a. Petitioner was advanced to 

paygrade E-3 effective 16 May 1990, E-4 effective

16 December 1991 and E-5 effective 16 December 1992 which was under the provision of a
STAR contract on 2 July 

1992.\

paygrade E-6 to be backdated was denied, in that,
b. That part of the request for 
paygrade E-6 did not meet any of the Final Multiple
Petitioner’s Final Multiple Score for 
Scores required to be advanced during the period Petitioner would have been eligible by
virtue of backdating the effective date of 

paygrade E-5.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner ’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

9lQsQLL
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

19 August 2003



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10538-02

    Original file (10538-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Kim, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 September 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04761-03

    Original file (04761-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06523-98

    Original file (06523-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 6523-98 1 April 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08035-01

    Original file (08035-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Novello, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08659-98

    Original file (08659-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02968-03

    Original file (02968-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05373-03

    Original file (05373-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05035-03

    Original file (05035-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07973-01

    Original file (07973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 September 200 1. allega\.ions of error and 2. (2), the Board finds the existence of an and especially in light of the iI?justice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05905-11

    Original file (05905-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...