DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
WMP
Docket No:
9 May 2002
8675-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 24 April 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
considered your
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 25 October 1988 for four
years at age 18. The record reflects that you received non-
judicial punishment (NJP) on four occasions for operating a
motor vehicle while drunk,
under the legal age limit,
substance, and unauthorized absence.
wrongful consumption of alcohol while
wrongful use of a controlled
On 24 October 1992, you were honorably released from active duty
and transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve.
At that time you
were assigned an RE-4B reenlistment code.
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4B reenlistment code
to individuals when there is a military or civilian record of
in-service illegal drug involvement and there is no potential
for further service.
The Board found no evidence in the
available records that you were recommended for retention or
that you had potential for further service.
that your NJP for wrongful use of a controlled substance,
coupled with three additional
NJP's, provided sufficient
justification to warrant a non-recommendation for reenlistment
The Board
and the assignment of an RE-4B reenlistment code.
thus concluded that the reenlistment code was proper and no
change is warranted.
denied.
furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
your application has been
Accordingly,
The Board concluded
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4676 14
In regard to your assertion, the Board noted that the record contains documented evidence that the assignment of an RE-4B reentry code was not due to an administrative error and WaS appropriate for your situation. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03843-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your case was heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which voted three to one in Favor of an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05213 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01533-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 1533-09 23 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ii Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps and current member of the Marine Corps Reserve, applied to this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00587-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 587-0720 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2007. The Board also considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03668-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201817
The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning and for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc. On 28 March 2012, the Applicant signed a counseling sheet acknowledging that she would receive an Honorable characterization of service with an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0298 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. present in your case, such as your many years of honorable service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05669-08
At the time of separation, [he] was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4B, which indicates he was not recommended for reenlistment due to in-service drug involvement. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-3C reenlistment code on 19 January 2008, vice the RE-4B. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the change in his record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03737-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. fully supported the other than honorable discharge, based on the positive urinalysis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...