Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03737-02
Original file (03737-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

WMP
Docket No:
26 November 2002

3737-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application,
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

together with all material submitted in

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 16 November
On 16 March 2001, a Navy drug
2000 for four years at age 34.
laboratory reported that the results of a random drug screening
urinalysis had tested positive for amphetamines and
methamphetamines.
April 2001 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for
wrongful use of a controlled substance.
for failure to go to our appointed place of duty.
punishment imposed was forfeitures of $585 per month for two
months, 45 days of restriction and extra duty, and reduction to
paygrade  E-2.

As a result of this positive urinalysis, on 2

NJP was also imposed

The

On 3 July  2001, you were notified that separation action was
being initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
were advised of and waived all of your procedural rights.

You

On 3 July 2001, your commanding officer
action, recommending an other than honorable discharge due to
misconduct, to the discharge authority.
discharge was directed and, on 6 August 2001, you were
discharged under other than honorable conditions.
an RE-4 reenlistment code was assigned.

On 30 July 2001

forwarded the separation

At that time,

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors such as your contention that
you never used drugs and that the urine specimen was taken
However, the Board concluded that the record
before a weekend.
fully supported the other than honorable discharge, based on the
positive urinalysis.
provided no evidence to support your contentions that you never
used drugs or that the urine tested was not yours.
the RE-4 reenlistment code,
individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.
your application has been denied.
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

such a code must be assigned when an
Accordingly,

Furthermore, the Board noted that you have

The names and votes of the

Concerning

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

it is important to keep in mind that

You are entitled to have

In this regard,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03659-02

    Original file (03659-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record On 30 July 2001 you appealed the NJP based on an investigation into the chain of custody of the urine samples, and a negative analysis of a hair sample you submitted to a private laboratory after the NJP. The Board concurred With regard to your contentions pertaining to the chain of custody of the urine samples, sample, the Board concurred with the remarks in the commanding officer's endorsement of your NJP appeal to the effect there was no chain of custody problem with analysis...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10826-02

    Original file (10826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 10826-02 11 September 2003 The Board also considered an advisory opinion on.a from the Navy Environmental Health Your allegations of error and application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the United This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code section 1552. commanding officer's decision at NJP that you had used drugs was reasonable, given...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00571-00

    Original file (00571-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    refrigerator first, the other individual who was unable to provide a full sample placed the bottle in the refrigerator after him. stated that you had not used LSD. map" for the commanding officer's use in deciding However, the February 1992 issuance of Navy When it was issued with OPNAVINST The Board concluded that since the CO did not have (NA.VADMIN) "road the appendix was clearly designed to The Board believed that the urinalysis was conducted in accordance with regulations and was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03673-07

    Original file (03673-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06158-01

    Original file (06158-01.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    g. A Navy pharmacologist submitted a report to the ADB in which she stated that both marijuana and hemp will produce the metabolite THC. The majority notes that the DAA.R reporting the accession urinalysis was apparently never acted upon by anyone and it was not considered in the discharge processing. The foregoing report of the Board is submitted for your review and action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04427-01

    Original file (04427-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a statement he submitted on the date of the NJP, The disciplinary action was based on a urine sample when he received NJP for use of f. On 23 June 2000 Petitioner appealed the NJP on the grounds that he was denied access to the "litigation package" prepared by the Navy drug laboratory, "innocent ingestion" defense or question the chain of custody at the drug laboratory. At the time of the positive urinalysis result, Petitioner had never been the subject of a disciplinary action during...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06979-00

    Original file (06979-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    in which his division officer, LT (G) upon returning ETCS (St.C) recalls an event on March 17, 1997 aboard USS SAIPAN from morning officers' call, informed him that the CSD division had been selected for urinalysis screening. that had the whatever division I am in. contention that CSF division was selected only because you were a However, every individual who testified member of that division.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08713-98

    Original file (08713-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The drug laboratory reported on 23 December received.nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 9 February 1998 for You use of cocaine. However, the commanding officer denied your request, noting that the reduction was the result of NJP and the action of the ADB did not overturn a judicial proceeding. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00592-05

    Original file (00592-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11133-06

    Original file (11133-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 18 September 1986 at age 27 and served for nearly two years...