Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01533-09
Original file (01533-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

SMS
Docket No: 1533-09

23 April 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 

Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ii

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former
enlisted member of the Marine Corps and current member of the Marine
Corps Reserve, applied to this Board requesting an RE-1A reenlistment
code vice the RE-4B that was issued on 30 October 2007, when he was
released from active duty under honorable conditions.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. <@@iiifie, Ms. ulm, and

Mr. ie, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of. error and
injustice on 22 April 2009, and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should
be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records,
memorandum provided by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance
Evaluation Review Branch (PERB), and applicable statutes, regulations

and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ali
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner’s application was filed in a timely manner.

c. On 7 October 2003, Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps at
age 19. During the period 3 April 2004 to 29 September 2006, he
participated in Operation Combined Joint Task Force Haiti and two
operations in Iraq. On 26 January 2007, he was convicted by a
summary court-martial for use of cocaine. On 30 October 2007, he was
released from active duty under honorable conditions due to
completion of required active service and assigned an RE-4B
reenlistment code. At that time his awards included two combat
action ribbons, a Good Conduct Medal, an Armed Forces Expeditionary
Medal, an Iraq Campaign Medal, a Humanitarian Service Medal, a
National Defense Service Medal, two Sea Service Deployment Ribbons, a
Global War on Terrorism (GWT) Expeditionary Medal and GWT Service
Medal, and two Navy Unit Commendations.

d. Attached to enclosure (1) is a memorandum from Headquarters
Marine Corps, which states, in part, as follows:

...it has been determined that at the time of
separation [Petitioner] should have been assigned
a reenlistment code of RE-4B, which means that
there is a military or civilian in-service

illegal drug involvement and there is no potential
for further service...

...A review of the disciplinary portion shows that
[Petitioner] received one Summary Court-Martial
for violating Article 112a (wrongfully use,
possession of controlled substance)...

... After a review of all relevant information,
this Headquarters concurs in the professional
evaluation of [Petitioner's] qualifications
for reenlistment at the time of separation...
e. In his application, Petitioner states that the RE-4B
reenlistment code was based on a biased opinion given by a retaining

specialist and requests an RE-1A.

f. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-1A reenlistment code
if a member meets all reenlistment prerequisite criteria and is
recommended for retention. Regulations also state that service
members who have confirmed illegal use, possession, sale, or
distribution of a controlled substance will not be granted a waiver
to reenlist. Regulations further direct assignment of an RE-4B
reenlistment code when a service member has a military or civil
record of in-service illegal drug involvement and there is no
potential for further service. Regulations also authorize assignment
of an RE-4 reenlistment code when a service member is not recommended

for reenlistment.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants limited relief.
Specifically, the Board finds that he does not meet the reenlistment
prerequisites for assignment of an RE-1A reenlistment code, but finds
that although he was convicted by a court-martial for use of cocaine,
he was retained on active duty for more than nine months before he
was released under honorable conditions and transferred to the Marine
Corps Individual Ready Reserve where he is still subject to recall to
active duty at any time. Therefore, the Board finds that he does not
fully meet the requirements for assignment of an RE-4B reenlistment
code, since he does have potential for further service. Furthermore,
the Board finds that his drug-related court-martial conviction
supports his non-recommendation for reenlistment. Therefore, the
Board finds that the RE-4B reenlistment code should be changed to an
RE-4.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code on 30 October 2007, vice the
RE-4B.

b. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval
record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for
the change in his record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review

and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board's proceedings in the’ above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN Ganon} trong
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. The foregoing action of the Board is submitted for your review and

action.
lo Doar S ,

W. DEAN PFET
Executive Di

   
 

Reviewed and approved:

QAR ATE. G&L

“a -WA] OQ

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11631-08

    Original file (11631-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Regulations state that Marines serving on active duty in pay grade E-4 and below will receive SA proficiency and conduct marks on 31 January and 31 July, and Marines who have received proficiency and conduct marks within the prior 90 days will receive SA proficiency and conduct marks of "not available" (NA). The Board also considers his two deployments to Iraq, awards, and present status in the Marine Corps Reserve. c. That Petitioner's naval record be further corrected by removing any...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05669-08

    Original file (05669-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time of separation, [he] was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4B, which indicates he was not recommended for reenlistment due to in-service drug involvement. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-3C reenlistment code on 19 January 2008, vice the RE-4B. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the change in his record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05733-07

    Original file (05733-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 5733-07 7 February 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy [EW OF NAVAL RECORD OF % Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting to change his RE-4B reenlistment code that was assigned on 9 September 2006, when he was separated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07545-06

    Original file (07545-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 November 1988 Petitioner received NJP for wrongful use of cocaine during the period from 1 to 31 July 1988. On 10 December 1988 Petitioner’s commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by the positive urinalysis for cocaine. Accordingly, the Board believes that Petitioner’s NJP, imposed on 20 November 1988, should be removed from the record, and that the record should also be corrected to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500483

    Original file (MD0500483.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I recommend LCpl M_ be separated with an other than honorable characterization of service, a reenlistment code of RE-4B and separation proficiency and conduct marks of 4.5 and 3.0 respectively.010517: Commanding Officer, I Marine Expeditionary Force Headquarters Group, recommended to Commanding General, I Marine Expeditionary Force Headquarters Group, that the Applicant be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12321-08

    Original file (12321-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an RE-1 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 that was issued on 18 November 2007, when he was honorably released from active duty. d. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, which states, in part, as follows: ... [Petitioner's] service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that at the time of separation he was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03668-03

    Original file (03668-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 11 14_07_47 CDT 2000

    Petitioner’s three—member Administrative Discharge Board sat from 7 to 8 December, found unanimously that the allegation of drug use was substantiated, and recommended separation with a general (under On 15 October, the Attorney Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR),_APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF (FORMER) GUNNERY SERGEANT~!J~t~~J ~ S. MARINE CORPS honorable) characterization of service. Petitioner was 7~q~97 b. Board for Correction reviE-iof ~ the administrative recommended in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08054-08

    Original file (08054-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) of 21 November 2007, all material referencing charges, and the punishment imposed. In the enclosed advisory opinion dated 1 April 2009, the Headquarters Marine Corps Manpower Information, Manpower Management Information System Division (MIO) recommended...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02492-03

    Original file (02492-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2003. your application, together with all material submitted in support your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations thereof, and policies. Y MARINE CORP S D 134.5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1040 MMER/RE 8 2003 MAR 1 MEMORANDUM'FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Encl: FORMER SUBJ: DD Form 149 of 30 Dee 2002 s...