Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00129-02
Original file (00129-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

WMP
Docket No:
9 May 2002

0129-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
Your allegations of error and
application on 8 May 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of  
error or injustice.

probable,material

You enlisted in the Naval Reserves on 22 November 1993 as a SR
(E-l) for 36 months of active duty at age 19. Your record
reflects that you served without incident until 25 May 1994,
when you received non-judicial punishment (NJP) for drunken or
reckless driving.
to AA (E-2), which was suspended for six months, forfeiture of
$348 per month for two months,

The punishment imposed was reduction in rate

and 30 days of extra duty.

As a result of the NJP of 25 May 1994, you were afforded in-
patient alcohol rehabilitation treatment at the Navy Alcohol
Rehabilitation Center in Jacksonville FL,
2 September 1994.
following:

On 1 September 1994 you acknowledged the

which you completed on

"Should you fail to complete all aspects of your aftercare

program or if you are involved in a subsequent alcohol
related incident, per OPNAVINST  
3630550, it is recommended that you be processed for
administrative separation from the Navy."

5350.4B and 

NAVMILPERSMAN

You participated without incident in your aftercare program,
which you completed on 28 August 1995.

Your record reflects you served without incident until you were
interviewed by the Mental Health Department at Naval Hospital,
Roosevelt Roads, PR after you voiced vague suicidal ideations
with one of your co-workers.
indicated that you had previously received alcohol treatment
while on active duty, but had begun drinking again.
At the
conclusion of this interview,
sponsor, attend weekly AA meetings, obtain a "big book" from AA
or CAAC personnel, and review the instructions and guidelines
contained in the "big book"

During this interview, you

you agreed to obtain an AA

and begin practicing them.

On 22 January 1996, you were interviewed by your division
officer to determine your progress concerning your alcohol
rehabilitation, as previously discussed.
you admitted that you had failed to adhere to the agreement
concerning your treatment.
You freely admitted you had not
obtained an AA sponsor,
meeting and that you had not obtained a "big book".
Additionally, your leading petty officer said that on one
occasion since the last meeting,
his home.
separation for alcohol rehabilitation failure was provided by
the mental health department to your commanding officer.

Based on this information, a recommendation for

that you had only attended one AA

you drank alcohol beverages at

During this interview

On 4 March 1996, you were notified of the proposed separation
action by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure.
advised of your procedural rights concerning this matter and
elected to retain your right to counsel, and retained all of
your rights concerning the proposed separation.
1996, you provided a written statement concerning this matter,
which stated, in part that:

You were

On 20 February

"I feel that I have not deviated from, or have failed to
meet the restrictions/conditions'as required by Level III
Aftercare Program.
My Aftercare Program was successfully

2

completed on 28 Aug 95, as verified by ref (a), the Exit
memo being released and signed by my previous Commanding
I have not let the use of alcohol interfere
Officer, . .
with the safe and efficient performance of my military
duties, nor have I allowed it to reflect any discredit  
myself or to the Department of the Navy."

upon

On 11 March 1996, your proposed separation was approved by the
commanding officer, acting as the general court-martial
authority and you were honorably discharged on 5 April 1996 by
the reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure and assigned an
4 reenlistment code.

 

RE-

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors such as your age and your
contention that you acted foolishly.
RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulation when an
individual is discharged for alcohol rehabilitation failure.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

However, assignment of a

The names and

The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation,
alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, should be changed. In
this regard, you did not request such a change, and have not
exhausted you administrative remedies by applying to the Naval
Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
used to apply to NDRB.

The enclosed DD Form 293 may be

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate  the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

it is important to keep in mind that

You are entitled to have

In this regard,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00762

    Original file (ND03-00762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00762 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030328. On the issue of the change of the RE Code of 4 to that of RE1, we ask that the Board direct the FSM to complete the application DD Form 149 for submittal to the Board For Correction as the Discharge Review Agency does not have jurisdiction on this matter. The summary of service clearly documents her alcohol rehabilitation failure as the reason she was discharged.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00542

    Original file (ND02-00542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (f)(1).As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the Applicant submits to the Board's discretionary authority, under SECNAVIST 5420.174C.Under the premises of equitable relief, we believe the Board can changed the narrative reason to Convenience Of The Government, and the change of the last name to (M_), as...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00575

    Original file (MD01-00575.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since my discharge I have become a U. The Board found the applicant did not complete required alcohol rehabilitation by reason of his failure to complete the aftercare requirements, which was a documented requirement of his alcohol rehabilitation program. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600384

    Original file (ND0600384.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00384 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20060104. Implement survival plan.Applicant acknowledged having read and understood aftercare plan.890619: Applicantreleased from Naval Hospital, Oakland, CA having successfully completed 6 weeks Level III Alcohol Rehabilitation Treatment.890622: Treatment Summary, Alcohol Rehabilitation Department, Naval Hospital, Oakland, CA, CDR S. W. S_, MC, USNR, Head, Alcohol Rehabilitation Department: This 24 year old...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00198-02

    Original file (00198-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your record further reflects that you were awarded your third Navy Achievement Medal in April 1996 and were advanced to chief petty officer (E-7) on 16 August 1996 Your record further shows that you were hospitalized for alcohol detoxification between 14 to 16 October 1997, and subsequently returned to your command for immediate assignment to an alcohol treatment program. Although your record does not contain the documents concerning your alcohol abuse treatment, it is clear from your...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00491

    Original file (MD99-00491.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Command inadequate response by denying additional Level III treatment and denying my attendance to aftercare meetings. Also please consider that I had received an honorable discharge from the U.S. Army (1986-1989), and had already received a Honorable discharge from the Marine Corps upon re-enlistment, and was into my third enlistment in military service. 960103: GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune] determined that applicant had no potential for further service, that...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00922

    Original file (ND99-00922.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00922 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990629, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Disabled. Applicant did not object to the discharge.900223: CO, SERVSCOLCOM Orlando recommended and directed the applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. After a thorough review of the records, supporting...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00478

    Original file (MD99-00478.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00478 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990218, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The fact remains that Corporal (Applicant) has been determined to be an alcohol abuser. However, the service that is recorded in Corporal (Applicant)'s record book merits a general discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501531

    Original file (MD0501531.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application to the Board:“The reason for my claim is that my command at the time did not put me into a proper after care program after the completion of my level 3 treatment. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19980130 by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure (A) with a service characterization of general (under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500622

    Original file (ND0500622.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Affidavit #1I was honorably discharged from the military for alcohol rehabilitation failure without ever having a negative incident during my military time served. I was never afforded the opportunity to speak to my commanding officer, an NJP hearing, JAG representation, or a DAPA representative for the circumstances leading to my forced discharge. Applicant needs to follow-up with DAPA/AA.