Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07841-01
Original file (07841-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD  FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 7841-01
28 January 2002

Your allegations of error and

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 24 January 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 24 March
1997 at age 21.
received nonjudicial punishment for use of marijuana and cocaine.
On 19 August 1997 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of
misconduct due to drug abuse.
recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your
case to an administrative discharge board.
discharge authority,
approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable
discharge on 30 January 1998.
reenlistment code of  
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4B
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to drug
abuse.
Since you have been treated no differently than others in
your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in
the assignment of your reenlistment code.

The record reflects that on 18 July 1997 you

At that time you were assigned a

Accordingly, your

When informed of the

the recommendation for separation was

After review by the

RE-4B.

since you did not ask for such

The names and votes of the members

application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service should be changed,
consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05727-07

    Original file (05727-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedy of applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03142-02

    Original file (03142-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this material considered by the Board consisted of Board. paygrade E-l, restriction and extra The On 16 August 1999 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00587-07

    Original file (00587-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 587-0720 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2007. The Board also considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06215-07

    Original file (06215-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board Consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 November 1998, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 19. Given your BCD that resulted from a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01044-02

    Original file (01044-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05321-00

    Original file (05321-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. the Board could not find an error or others in your situation, injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07577-01

    Original file (07577-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02018-06

    Original file (02018-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 14 January 1997 at age 19. The names and votes of the members of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07771-01

    Original file (07771-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was reduced in grade from LCPL (E-3) to PFC (E-2), vice to W T (E-1) . Since Petitioner has been treated no differently than others discharged by reason of drug abuse, the Board concludes that there was no error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4B reenlistment code. The Board further...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04281-01

    Original file (04281-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The The Board...