Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00165-09
Original file (00165-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

LCC
Docket No. 165-09

10 Mar 09

 

Dear

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

9 March 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser
N130E2/09U0127 of 4 March 2009, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

furnished upon request.

It ig regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.
\ Sea

 

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000

 

7220
Ser N130E2/09U0127

uh 7 4 ROOF

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters

Subj: REQUEST FOR BCNR ADVISORY OPINION ICO +

Ref: (a) Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR)
Encl: (1) BCNR Case File #165-09

 

1. Per your request, the following recommendation concerning
enclosure (1) is provided.

2. In Enclosure (1) Rate 3°20 es that his shipment of

HHG from # 7 , upon termination of ADSW, to his HOR in the
non wiheeeiiiies was misrouted and as a result arrived

after the intended delivery date, there by forcing him to reside in a

hotel at his home of record from March 2008 to 9 August 2008. 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00299-09

    Original file (00299-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130E2/09U0125, a copy of which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates that the petitioner was improperly authorized a rental car while assigned to the ii a> area on an Active Duty Training (ADT) Permanent Change of Station order of over 140 days. Such a change would violate a Comptroller General ruling that PCS orders may not be converted into temporary duty to increase entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06994-01

    Original file (06994-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your naval record and III addition, the Board considered the advisory nlemorandum 7220 Ser N 130C3/021.10071 of 2 I February 2002, a CNO After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11082-09

    Original file (11082-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LEC Docket No. i. Petitioner's application was staffed to the following offices within the Navy for review and comment: The Navy Personnel Command (PERS 41), the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO Code N130), and the Navy Supply System's Command (NAVSUPSYSCMD) . Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05481-01

    Original file (05481-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl : (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N (3) Subject ’s naval record 13OC3/01 II 1290 of 4 October 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to travel of dependents and shipment, of household goods (I) with this Board requesting, (HHGs) to May TX. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08675-00

    Original file (08675-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this case the member's old PDS was not OCONUS so this article of the JFTR does not apply. 4. reassigned from a PDS in DC) and his dependents remained in the same residence as when the IAW reference (a) article U5222- member served at the old PDS.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02404-01

    Original file (02404-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03042-04

    Original file (03042-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is not indebted for his travel from Misawa, Japan to Zambalas, Philippines, his Home of Record (HOR) for emergency leave. G.L.ADAMS Head, Pay Section Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09213-07

    Original file (09213-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show authorization of ADSW orders for a period of 167 days to Kingston, Jamaica vice ADT orders.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on March 10, 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008495

    Original file (20140008495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of: * Orders 126-374, dated 6 May 2010, to show he was ordered to Full-Time National Guard Duty - Operational Support (FTNGD-OS) for the period 1 May to 30 September 2010 vice 7 May 2010 to 30 September 2010 * his records to show he was entitled to and used 10 days permissive temporary duty (PTDY) vice 10 days ordinary leave in September 2010 (emphasis added) 2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was issued orders to FTNGD-OS with the CA CDTF,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006506

    Original file (20080006506.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter to the Senator's office further reads that the applicant's orders erroneously authorized the transportation of HHG to an HOS instead of his HOR or place of entry on active duty and that the transportation office incorrectly advised the applicant that the time limit was 1 year. The Senator's office was informed by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, that if requested by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, they will support the applicant's request for...