Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05187-01
Original file (05187-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 5187-01
23 August 2001

From: Chairman,
Secretary
To:

Board for Correction of Naval Records
of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW. OF

NAVAL RECORD OF

Ref:

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:  (1) DD   Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy,
Board requesting, in effect,
by changing the reenlistment code assigned on 29 June 1993.

that his naval record be corrected

filed enclosure (1) with this

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Shy, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21
August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in
timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.

C . Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 7 June 1993 at age 19.
d. On 22 June 1993, while still in recruit training,

Petitioner was found to be alcohol dependent.
Petitioner received a void enlistment by reason of
enlistment 
reenlistment code of RE-4.

jurisdiction.'1

- lack of 

At that time he received a

On 29 June 1993,

 

"void

e. Title 10 U.S.C. 978 states, in part, that the enlistment of

a person who is determined to be dependent on drugs or alcohol at
at the time of such enlistment, or within 72 hours, shall be
void.
it was not discovered within the required 72 hours.

Even though Petitioner was found to be alcohol dependent,

f. Sailors separated within the first 180 days of active duty

normally receive an entry level separation.

g. An individual separated in recruit training due to a
diagnosis of alcohol dependence is separated by reason of
erroneous enlistment due to alcohol abuse.
code must be assigned to an individual so separated.

An RE-4 reenlistment

CONCLUSION:

In this regard, the Board concludes that his void

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
enlistment should be changed to an entry level separation by
reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol abuse with an RE-4
reenlistment code.
determination of dependence was not made during the 72 hour time
period required for a void enlistment.
enlistment was inappropriate and Petitioner should have received
an entry level separation.
Board that the reason for separation should be changed to
erroneous enlistment due to alcohol abuse.
code is appropriate in Petitioner's case since he was separated
by reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol dependence.

Additionally, it is clear to the

An RE-4 reenlistment

This conclusion is based on the fact that the

Therefore, a void

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an
injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he

was issued an entry level separation by reason of erroneous
enlistment due to alcohol abuse on 29 June 1993, vice the void
enlistment now of record.

b. That no further relief be granted.
C . That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's

naval record be returned to the Board,
of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained
for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner's naval record.

together with this Report

2

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

c

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9805169

    Original file (NC9805169.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Rothlein, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Therefore, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to show that he was discharged with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. That Petitioner's naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03924-01

    Original file (03924-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting, in effect, by changing the reenlistment code assigned on 15 March 1993. that his naval record be corrected filed enclosure (1) with this consisting of Mr. Brezna, Mr. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and 2. Additionally, it is clear to the Therefore, a void In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05747-06

    Original file (05747-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100TJRDocket No: 5747-06 26 February 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06759-01

    Original file (06759-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an enlistment is voided or if an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol abuse. Concerning Petitioner's request for a change in his reenlistment code, an RE-4 reenlistment code is appropriate in Petitioner's case since he was separated prior to completing recruit training by reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol dependency. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08432-01

    Original file (08432-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosis of alcohol dependence. Additionally, the applicable regulation requires the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of "erroneous entry-alcohol abuse. " That Petitioner's naval record be corrected'by issuing him a new DD Form 214 which reflects that he served on active duty from 8 February to 8 March...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02764-01

    Original file (02764-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 CRS Docket No: 2764-01 15 January 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Subj: Secretary of the Navy OF2 ECORD .-, (a) 10 U.S.C. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial In this regard it is clear that Petitioner was not relief. That any material or entries inconsistent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06707-97

    Original file (06707-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 12 January 1996. Such a code is required under these An RE-4 reenlistment code is Absent a Accordingly, In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02684-01

    Original file (02684-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2684-01 21 August 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that the reason for discharge and his reenlistment code be changed. Thereafter, the discharge authority directed that Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05561-06

    Original file (05561-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the availabl& evidence of record. On 20 February 1999 Petitioner was issued a void enlistment due to alcohol dependence and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.e. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was separated on 20 February 1999 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01830-99

    Original file (01830-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1830-99 13 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To : Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 0 Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record t I i 1. The regulation requires the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of "erroneous enlistment-alcohol abuse. l1 i. Petitioner states that he did not erroneously enlist nor does he have an alcohol problem.