Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06621-00
Original file (06621-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

ELP
Docket No. 6621-00
23 March 2001

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

RD OF

(a)

(1)
(2)
(3)

10 U.S.C.1552

DD Form 149 w/attachments
HQMC Memo 1070 JAM 4 OF 13 FEB 01
Subject's Naval Record

1.

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps,
applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be
corrected to show that on 19 June 2000 he was reduced to PFC
(E-2) vice PVT (E-l).

The Board, consisting of Ms. Wiley, Messrs. Ivins and

2.
McPartlin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 21 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record.
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record

3.
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

Petitioner's application to the Board was filed in a

timely manner.

b.

C .

Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 20 May  1999

for four years at age 19.

The record reflects that he was

advanced to LCPL (E-3) and served without incident until 19 June
2000 when he received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for use of
cocaine.
PVT, forfeitures of $500 per month for two months, and 45 days
of restriction and extra duty.
punishment.

Punishment imposed consisted of a reduction in rank to

He did not appeal the

d.

As a result of his drug use, Petitioner was processed

for discharge by reason of misconduct.
other than honorable conditions
copy of the DD Form 214 was not
for the Board's review.

He was discharged under

on 10 July 2000.
on file in the record provided

However, a

e.

At enclosure (2) is an advisory opinion from

Headquarters Marine Corps which
commanding officer was not authorized to reduce him two pay
grades at NJP and recommends that the record be corrected to
show a reduction of one pay grade.

states that Petitioner's

CONCLUSION:

The Board is aware that commanding officers at NJP only

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
have authority to reduce an individual by one pay grade.
Therefore, the Board agrees with the recommendation contained in
the advisory opinion that the record be corrected to show that
on 19 June 2000 Petitioner was reduced from LCPL to PFC vice the
reduction to PVT now of record.

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show
that on 19 June 2000 he was reduced from LCPL to PFC vice the
reduction to PVT now of record.

b.

That any material or entries inconsistent with or

relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

C .

That any material directed to be removed from

Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board together with
a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
references being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

2

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

N

E: GOLDSMITH

ALAN 
Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6

5.
(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6
(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is
hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a),
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

has been approved by the

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07426-00

    Original file (07426-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HQMC Memo 1070 JAM4 of 13 Feb 01 (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that on 22 December 1999 he was reduced to PFC (E-2) vice PVT (E-l). The Board is aware that commanding officers at NJP only RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07771-01

    Original file (07771-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was reduced in grade from LCPL (E-3) to PFC (E-2), vice to W T (E-1) . Since Petitioner has been treated no differently than others discharged by reason of drug abuse, the Board concludes that there was no error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4B reenlistment code. The Board further...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00183-02

    Original file (00183-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HQMC Memos (3) Subject's naval record JAM2A of 21 Mar 02 and MMPR-2 of 12 Apr 02 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. an enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not reduced in grade at nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 29 September 1998. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05224-05

    Original file (05224-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by changing her reenlistment code and restoring her to corporal (CPL; E-4).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mr. and Ms. -reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01915-00

    Original file (01915-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1915-00 14 August 2000 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: Encl: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his reenlistment code be changed. Ms. Hardbower reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07545-06

    Original file (07545-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 November 1988 Petitioner received NJP for wrongful use of cocaine during the period from 1 to 31 July 1988. On 10 December 1988 Petitioner’s commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by the positive urinalysis for cocaine. Accordingly, the Board believes that Petitioner’s NJP, imposed on 20 November 1988, should be removed from the record, and that the record should also be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03371-07

    Original file (03371-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired Marine, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not reduced in grade from private first class (PFC; E-2) to private (Pvt; E-l).2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice onApril 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08378-02

    Original file (08378-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing the general discharge, reason for discharge, and the RE-3C reenlistment code issued on 27 October 1987. Petitioner's conduct and A minimum However, '10" given upon the initial Without the mark of zero, h. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of an RE-3C reenlistment code to an individual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08600-06

    Original file (08600-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2007. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Nevertheless, on 17 November 1969 you received your sixth NUP for failure to obey a lawful order and were awarded restriction and extra duty for 14 days. The record further reflects that on 1...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01374-99

    Original file (01374-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. Since the NJP appeal was approved, Petitioner is requesting that all documentation concerning the NJP be removed from his record. f. At enclosure (2) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps which notes that the NJP entries were made in accordance with regulations and the entries properly set forth the fact that the appeal was approved. Accordingly, the Board concludes that all documentation concerning the NJP of 18 November 1998 and the appeal should be removed from both...