DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No:
29 August 2002
6608-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You contend in your application that 90 days before the
You reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve for three years on 17
On 15 July 2001, you were released from a period
December 1998.
of active duty and transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve
(IRR).
expiration of your enlistment,
but because of inefficiencies in the system and the incompetence
of the individuals involved, your enlistment expired on 16
December 2001 before you could be reenlisted.
reenlistment without any broken service.
you began the reenlistment process
You are requesting
The Board does not normally correct the record to show a
reenlistment since it cannot be certain the individual is
eligible or otherwise qualified for such an action.
the Board considered whether the enlistment that ended on 16
December 2001 should be extended for a sufficient period to allow
your reenlistment.
to solve your problem was to defer any action until you have
actually reenlisted.
Once you have submitted proof of this
reenlistment, you may reapply to the Board, requesting that the
reenlistment be backdated to 17 December 2001.
is granted, you would then have no break in service.
However, the Board believed that the best way
If this request
Therefore,
Therefore,
the Board concluded that a correction to your record was not
warranted at this time.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04052-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2008. The Board concluded that you reenlisted in the USMCR on 17 January 2003, rather than the USMC, and that you did not have the right to be retained on active duty beyond 16 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05429-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Apparently in 2002, you realized that with 21 years of total service in the Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserve, you might be eligible for reserve retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08436-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The instruction states, in part, as follows: To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment...the member must be: (1) serving as a petty officer or, (2) serving in paygrade E-3 having passed an examination for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05958-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 18 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3 February 1996 you were You were Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are not recommended for reenlistment or who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06748-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals such as you who are released from active duty at the expiration of their period of obligated service and are not eligible or recommended for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06717-00
6717-00 14 June 2001 Dear ‘, This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. fo:r Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Board Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You allege that you were told the reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06935-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. Regulations in effect at the time of your release from active duty allowed for early release from active duty in certain circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10717-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 15 January 2002 you were honorably discharged by reason of expiration of enlistment and assigned an RE-30 reenlistment code, as directed by CMC. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08298-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. reporting to this command member has had 2 larceny convictions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06134-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...