Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06364-01
Original file (06364-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TRG
Docket No:
12 December 2001

6364-01

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 December 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof,
and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support

your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the.entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
1
You enlisted in the Navy on 19 October 1971 at age 19.
1972 you received nonjudicial punishment on two occasions and
were convicted by a special court-martial.
five periods of unauthorized absence totaling about 31 days.
You then made a deployment to Southeast Asia  
HOLLISTER (DD 788) and on 1 September 1972 you were awarded the
Combat Action Ribbon.

onboard the USS

Your offenses were

During

A special court-martial convened on 1 November 1973 and convicted
you of the theft of 158 pounds of meat from your ship and three
periods of unauthorized absence totaling about 17 days.
The
sentence of the court included a reduction in rate to SR (E-l)
and confinement at hard labor for two months.
You were restored
to duty from confinement on 21 December 1973.
During the period
from 21 January to 7 April 1974 you were an unauthorized absentee
on four occasions totaling about 26 days.

Based on the foregoing record,

you were processed for an

administrative discharge.
you elected to waive your right to have your case heard by an
administrative discharge board in exchange for a recommendation
for a general discharge.
recommended a general discharge by reason of unfitness.

In connection with this processing,

On 23 April 1974 the commanding officer

After
review by the discharge authority, this recommendation was
approved.

You received the general discharge on 26 April 1974.

You are also requesting that your rank be restored to you

years.
and that you be issued the medals to which you are entitled.
Board found that these factors and contentions were not
sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your general
discharge given your extensive disciplinary record.
believed that you were fortunate to have a general discharge
since a discharge under other than honorable conditions was
authorized.
proper as issued and no change is warranted.

The Board concluded that the general discharge was

The Board

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
contention, in effect,

The

Given the nature of the offenses of which you

The Board noted that you were reduced in rate to pay grade E-l by
a court-martial.
were convicted, the Board believed that you were fortunate not to
have received a bad conduct discharge, and a sentence which
included a reduction in rate was certainly not too severe. As
indicated in the enclosure, on 21 September 1988, the Navy
Liaison Office at the National Personnel Records Center forwarded
you all of the awards to which you are entitled.
action by the Board on this issue is not necessary.
correspondence on this matter should be addressed to the Navy
Liaison Office.

Any future

Therefore,

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval

2'

record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

3

IA REVIEW OF YOUR PERSONNEL RECORD AND THE RECORDS OF THE AWARDS BOAR0 INDICATES THAT YOU ARE
L@ THE FOLLOWING AWARDS AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE ARE ENCLOSED.

ELIGIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AWARDS.

-

OF 

NAVY CROSS
DISTINGUISHED SERVICE
SILVER STAR MEDAL
I 
F611lN 
_ - 
- 
_
._ 
_ 
_
_ 
MFRTT
DISTINGUISHED FLYING CROSS
NAVY/MARINE CORPS MEDAL
BRONZE STAR MEDAL
PURPLE HEART MEDAL
AIR MEDAL
COMMENDATION MEDAL, NAVY
ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL, NAVY
GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL:
USMC

NAVY

MEDAL

USCG
USCG

I
I
I

I

USCG

COAST GUARD RESERVE GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL
NAVAL RESERVE MERITORIOUS SERVICE MEDAL
ORGANIZED MARINE CORPS RESERVE 
EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, NAVAL
AMERICAN DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, 

tiEDAL
USMC
W/

1 AMERICAN CAMPAIGN I
ASIATIC PACIFIC CAI
EUROPEAN-AFRICAN-M

YEDAL
YPAIGN MEDAL
IDDLE -EASTERN CAMPAIGN MEDAL

CLASP

SERVICE MEDAL

HUMANITARIAN
RESERVE MEDAL, ARMED FORCES
IINTTFn  

MATTONS  SERVICE MEDAL

& “I.

11.1 

IL1 

I.... 

1 NAVY EXPERT R

IFLE MEDAL

COAST GUARD EXPERT RIFLEMAN 
NAVY EXPERT PISTOL MEDAL

NAVY

M

EDAL

i.COAST  GUARD EXPERT PISTOL SHOT MEDAL

USCG COMMANDANT'S LTR OF COMM

IENDATION  -RIBBON   BAR

x  COMBAT ACTION RIBBON8

PRESIDENTIAL 
NAVY, USCG UNIT COMMENDATION RIBBON BAR

UNIT COMMENDATION RIBBON

x  MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION RIBBON
USCG MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION
NAVY 
SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON
MARINE CORPS RESERVE RIBBON

"E"  RIBBON

izs5uzD

FOREIGNAWARDS:

(SE E NO TE 

BELOW)

PHILIPPINE DEFENSE/LIBERATION/INDEPENDENCE RIBBON
PHIL

 OF KOREA/VIETNAM

IPPINE/REPUBLIC

PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION

REPU BLIC OF VIETNAM MERITORIOUS UNIT CITATION

(GALLANTRY CROSS MEDAL COLOR WITH PALM)
REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM MERITORIOUS UNIT CITATION
(CIVIL  ACTIONS MEDAL, FIRST CLASS COLOR W/PALM)
\IGN  MEDAL &,//f&J-

CAMP!

w  REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM 

j WORLD WAR 

i1  VICTORY MEDAL

MEDAL FOR HUMANE ACTION

- NAVY OCCUPATION SERVICE MEDAL, 

CHINA  SERVICE  MEDAL  (EXTENDE D)

<  NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL

KOREAN SERVICE MEDAL
ANTARCTICA SERVICE 
COAST GUARD ARTIC SERVICE MEDAL
ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL

NEDAL

W/

CLASP

.I 

I

NOTE > FOREIGN DECORATIONS ARE NOT STOCKED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR 

-iuk

IT IS  RECOMMENDED THAT YOU CONTACT YOUR NEAREST

-w
&REPLACEMENT.

IF  REPLACEMENT IS DESIRED, 
CIVILIAN MILITARY SUPPLY STORE FOR ASSISTANCE.

0, AWARDS THAT HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ARE INDICATED BY AN

ASTERISK.
AWARDS CIRCLED ARE TEMPORARILY 
FORWARDED TO 
ACTION' BY 

WILL BE 

‘/O.U’ 

OUT OF STOCK. THEY WILL BE

Y0.U AS SOON AS‘THEY ARE AVAILABLE. NO ADDITIONAL

REQUIRED'TO RECEIVE THESE AWARDS.

c

l

NAVY  LIAISON  OFFICE, ROOM 3475
NATIONAL PERSONNEL RECORDS CENTER
9700 PAGE
LouIs* 

-BLVD
 
No 

63132

BT 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06987-09

    Original file (06987-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10020-06

    Original file (10020-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated 13 December 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05890-01

    Original file (05890-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. evidence in your records that you were engaged in actions that would entitle you to this award.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04062-02

    Original file (04062-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record.and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the letter to and policies. including the Bronze Star Medal, However, Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense provides for the consideration of award Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, which was enacted into law on February 10, 1996, recommendations, you be able to locate your former commanding officer or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003550

    Original file (20080003550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the record of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces Honor Medal First Class, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star Citation, and the Meritorious Unit Citation. The U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Memorandum, dated 19 April 1968, shows the FSM was authorized to accept and wear the Armed Forces Honor Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009855

    Original file (20110009855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars, Combat Action Ribbon, Valorous Unit Award, and two Overseas Service Bars. The applicant's DA Form 20 shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service): Vietnam from 21 October 1969 through his Expiration of Term of Service (ETS); b. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to the: (1) 137th Engineer Company (Light Engineers) from 25 October 1969...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021365

    Original file (20090021365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation, streamer embroidered Vietnam 1967-1968, the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, streamer embroidered Vietnam 1966-1971, and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of Meritorious Unit Commendation,...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-081

    Original file (2008-081.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant asked that his DD 214 be corrected to show that he is entitled to “Sikorsky wings.” There is no such medal or award listed in the Medals and Awards Manual (MAM), COMDTINST M1650.25D, and the Coast Guard states that it is not an authorized military award but an award issued by a private corporation. Therefore, because the WINONA received a “Military Readiness Award” during Refresher Training in November 1967, while the applicant was a member of the crew, the Board finds that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075734C070403

    Original file (2002075734C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The 6 January 1999 Headquarters, USMC letter did not show that the applicant had been awarded a Silver Star or higher award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016764

    Original file (20090016764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show a second award of the Army Commendation Medal. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show two awards of the Army Commendation Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.