DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
X
0
TJR
Docket No: 1363-01
16 August 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 August 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof,
Board was unable to obtain your service record and conducted its
review based on the documentation submitted with your
application.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
Your allegations of error and
The
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 18 June 1980 at the
age of 19.
received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for drunk and disorderly
conduct.
The punishment imposed was a $200 forfeiture of pay.
Your record reflects that on 4 August 1980 you
On 14 April 1982, after undergoing a physical examination, you
were diagnosed with a mixed bipolar disorder and recommended for
an administrative separation.
Subsequently, you were processed
for a general discharge by reason of physical disability as
evidenced by the diagnosed mixed bipolar disorder, and on 14 May
1982 you were so discharged.
At that time your conduct average
was 2.5.
Character of service was based, in part,
trait averages which were computed from marks assigned during
periodic evaluations.
required at the time of your service for a fully honorable
characterization of service.
An average of 3.0 in conduct was
on conduct and overall
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity and good post service conduct.
However, the Board concluded these factors and contention were
not sufficient to warrant a change in the characterization of
your service because of your misconduct and since your conduct
average was insufficiently high to warrant an honorable
discharge.
Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board
concluded your discharge was proper and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
'Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07329-02
supports a diagnosis of a personality disorder. documents (sustained irritability, paranoia, not mixing well with people) are seen in personality disorders, including the one (Avoidant Personality Disorder) with which the Navy psychiatrists diagnosed this patient. A condition * The symptoms documented in the mental health assessments 3. meet DSM-IV criteria for a personality disorder -- see Reference The symptoms documented do not meet DSM-IV criteria for (c) either manic, hypomanic, major...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07119-99
Based on your conviction by Japanese authorities you were processed for an administrative discharge. The psychiatric diagnoses are Bipolar Disorder, You contend that your deprived background The and drug and alcohol abuse impaired your The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your conviction by Japanese authorities of a serious offense. The Board considered the psychiatric evaluation you showing that you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04738-01
The Petitioner appears to have suffered clinically from a Schizoid Personality Disorder since childhood, Paranoid Schizophrenia approximately eight years after his administrative separation from the Navy via a Board of Medical Survey. was admitted to Navy station Hospital tarily had not talked or moved secondary to not wanting #3002. and that the best diagnosis for his difficulties at this time is that of bipolar disorder, mixed type.” Dr. Plattner also noted that the veteran is “severely...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03010-00
” He was found fully fit for duty, and clinic for psychological testing. patient’s medical record. According to the as was “likely” thought to be “chronic and evaluation were diagnoses of somatization fit for duty, and the No on 16 OCTOBER psychological d. SF 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care, from USS Enterprise, dated 05 APR 1982, was sea_” Per this report documented results of a psychological evaluation per the request of the ship evaluation of a “possible life at examination at...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04603-01
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05330-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 23 August 1977 to 19...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02203-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your discharge given misconduct, and since your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant an honorable discharge. Consequently, when...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056145C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01548-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 1548-08 6 November 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF -SjiaiaildiiyieinelsiiniQiigliy ial Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, applied to this Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04905-01
Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Based on the foregoing the Board concludes that no The Board notes that were sufficiently high In view of the foregoing, injustice warranting the...