DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
ELP
Docket No. 2056-02
25 March 2002
From:
To:
Subj:
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF
a_,
t*
Ref:
(a) 10 U.S.C.1552
Encl:
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's Naval Record
(4) DD Form 214
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
1.
former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board
requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed.
The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd, Ms.
LeBlanc, and Ms.
2.
Suiter, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 20 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record.
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material
The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
3.
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:
a.
Before applying to this Board, Petitioner
exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
Petitioner's application to the Board was filed in a
timely manner.
C .
Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy on 13 June 1997 for
two years as an MSSN (E-3).
she had completed nearly five years of active service.
letter of appreciation, she was cited by the commanding officer
for her outstanding performance in the Food Services Division
from August 1995 to February 1996.
16 June 1997.
At the time of her reenlistment,
In a
She was advanced to MS3 on
d.
An evaluation report for the period 30 August to
15 December 1997 shows ratings of 4.0 (above standards) in all
categories, except for the category of "quality of
which she received a rating of 5.0 (greatly exceeds standards).
She received a "must promote"
for retention.
active service.
She had no disciplinary actions during her
recommendation and was recommended
work" in
e.
Petitioner was honorably discharged on 26 February 1998
by reason of parenthood and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
Neither the facts and circumstances surrounding her discharge
nor the DD Form 214 are on file in the record.
Form 214 provided by Petitioner is attached to this report.
A copy of the DD
f.
Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3B or
RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of
An RE-3B reenlistment code means that the sepa-
parenthood.
ration due to was parenthood,
for reenlistment except for this disqualifying factor.
reenlistment code means an individual is ineligible to reenlist
without prior approval of Commander, Navy Personnel Command.
and the individual is recommended
An RE-4
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
In this regard, the Board notes Petitioner had no
action.
disciplinary actions in more than five years of active service,
her excellent performance was specifically cited in a letter of
appreciation, and she was uniformally rated "above standards."
The Board could find no demonstrable reason why she was awarded
the most restrictive RE-4 reenlistment code.
the contrary, the Board concludes that it would appropriate and
just to change her reenlistment code to RE-3B to correspond with
the reason for her separation.
Absent
evideFice to
2
RECOMMENDATION:
a.
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing
assigned on 26 February 1998, to
RE-
the RE-4 reenlistment code,
3B.
b.
That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
C .
That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
references being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
4.
review and deliberations,
and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
Acting Recorder
-
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6
5.
(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6
(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is
hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a),
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
has been approved by the
IFFER
Executive Director
-_
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06341-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 ELP Docket No 6341-01 29 January 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04620-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted membr of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 11 June 1997. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc, Ms. Gilbert, and Mr. Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10755-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed. Nevertheless, she was administratively processed for separation by reason of parenthood due to her inability to comply with the NFC program. On 23 February 2004 the discharge authority, Navy Personnel Command (NPC), directed a reenlistment code of RE-3B, or a RE-4, if warranted by the service record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06232-01
The majority further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner' s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reasons for the assignment of the RE-3B reenlistment code. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 18 December 1998 she was assigned an RE-3B reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. Since Petitioner has been treated no differently than others who failed to advance to E-3, the minority could...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06065-02
provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a ber in the Navy, filed an application with ng that her reenlistment code be changed to . The Board excellent service, RE-4 reenlistment reenlistment due t Board believes tha reenlistment code less restrictive R recruiters that he reenlistment is au The Board further should be filed in undl reviewers will reenlistment code. Given the circumstances, the ncludes that this Report of Proceedings 'etitioner's naval record so that all future stand the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05172-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5172-08 5 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. e. On 6 February 2008 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted her service record and an RE-3B reenlistment code. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13656-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with Ghd Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. Since an RE-3B reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance for a Sailor who is separated for this reason, the Board concludes that an RE-3B reenlistment code is more appropriate than the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11012-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 11012-07 30 January 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW i i OVAL RECORD OF as Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting an honorable discharge and RE-3B...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04334-12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in her RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code issued on 12 January 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Storz and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00327-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. Since an RE-3B reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory _ guidance for a Sailor who is separated by reason of .parenthood, the Board concludes that the interest of justice would better be better served by changing Petitioner’s RE-4 reenlistment code to Re-3B rather than the RE-4 now of record. That...