DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
S
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 1836-02
20 August 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 20 August 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 80 of 22 July 2002, a copy of which is
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Your allegations of error and injustice were
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
5420
PERS-80
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters
(PERS-OOZCB)
Encl:
(1) BCNR File 01836-02
1.
Forwarded,
recommending disapproval.
Despite her being awarded
request to have
IAW Title 10
2.
her date or rank
adjusted is not warranted.
U.S.
paragraph (a).
the date of rank
adjustment for Lieutenant Junior Grade, her active service did
not start until her gain of 8 January 2000.
first look for promotion would not have occurred until she had
met the one-year rule as stated in Title 10.
appropriately considered and selected during the FY-02
Lieutenant Nurse Corps Selection Board which convened 14
She was
May
Code
§ 14301
Subsequently, her
Officer Career Progression
Division
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05756-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Kim and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. 2001 (copy in enclosure (1) at Tab A), she was advised of her message of 28 December selection for appointment to the CEC by the November 2001 Transfer/Redesignation Selection Board. They recommended changing her date of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08353-01
They stated ” They further stated “By waiting until 1 October 2001, her Air Force promotion to Command (NPC) office having cognizance over Naval Reserve personnel administration, has commented to the effect that Petitioner the Naval Reserve Lieutenant Commander promotion list “From the documentation provided in [her application at enclosure (l)], it is apparent the member was given inappropriate counsel as to the timing of her appointment into the Naval Reserve. They find Petitioner ’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03638-02
following comments and recommendation concerning request that her date of transfer to Standby Reserve-Inactive (USNR-S2) status be changed from 31 August 2000 to 1997 and all failures of selection that date be removed. After her release from active duty, she entered the Individual Ready Reserve the Naval Reserve. Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, regardless of their active participation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09248-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was promoted to commander at the 16 year point and was within the flow point guidelines.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05958-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08560-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting i n executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, theburden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The projection for her next in zone eligibility for captain puts her at the 23 year mark, which is also one year above the notional flow point and in accordance with SECNAVINST...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00511-01
considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 5 April, 23 July and 16 August 2001, copies of which are attached. The member requests the removal of the following fitness reports. performance and making recommendations concerning promotion and assignment are the responsibilities of the reporting senior.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05888-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his date of rank and effective date in the grade of lieutenant as 1 April 2002, vice 1 May 2002. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 October 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07022-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05903-02
They recommended against a special board for the FY 03 g- The memorandum for the record at enclosure (5) documents that a representative of the Bureau of Naval Personnel Petitioner’s record to show commissioning as an SC officer on 1 February 2002 would not cause cognizant Navy authorities to place the officer, without the officer special selection board for the FY 03 SC Commander Selection Board. Recommend approval of their requests for back-dating of effective date of commissioning as...