DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 5522-02
2 December 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 7 February 1950.
The record reflects that you received eight nonjudicial
The offenses included an unauthorized absence of a
punishments.
day, defecating in the division compartment, skylarking, causing
injury to another Sailor,
absence from your appointed place of duty,
get up at reveille,
disrespect on two occasions, and shirking duty.
you received a general discharge by reason of convenience of the
government.
failure to carry out orders, failure to
On 19 June 1953
Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and
both of which are computed from marks
proficiency averages,
assigned during periodic evaluations.
proficiency averages were 3.14 and 2.80, respectively.
average conduct mark of 3.25 was required for a fully honorable
characterization of service at the time of your separation:
Your conduct and
A minimum
In its
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
given your eight disciplinary actions and since your conduct
average was insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable
discharge.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
The
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02983-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02969-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. nonjudicial punishments were more than sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04499-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to However: the Board concluded that these factors were waPrant recharacterization of your discharge such as your youth and due to the two disciplinary actions as well as the fact that your conduct average...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06620-09
.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2010. You remained on active duty until 5 April 1990 when you were discharged under honorable conditions at the expiration of your enlistment based on your conduct mark average, 2.0. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04371-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The record reflects that you received four The offenses included unauthorized Thereafter, on 21 September 1979 you Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and proficiency averages, both of which are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03036-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2002. average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01073-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04993-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in.accordance with administrative regulations and procedures.applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 4 August 1975 you received a general discharge by Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and both of which are computed from marks proficiency averages, assigned during periodic evaluations. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06258-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three a deck court and a summary court-martial, and failure to received the require average in conduct. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2801-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were discharged under honorable conditions based on your conduct mark average. At the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service.