Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03601-01
Original file (03601-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TJR
Docket No: 3601-01
22 January 2002

c

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 January 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on  12 September 1994 at
the age of 18.
years and six months without disciplinary incident.

Your record reflects that you served for two

On 28 May and 6 June 1997,
examinations, you were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder and
a depressed mood.
The psychiatric reports noted, in part, that
you were frustrated with Navy life.
you had feelings of self-harm and were extremely unhappy with
military life.

after undergoing psychiatric

This reports also noted that

Your record further reflects that on 20 August 1997 you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for wrongful use of marijuana on
diverse occasions from March to July 1997.
imposed was a $500 forfeiture of pay,
for 45 days, and a reduction to 

restriction and extra duty

The punishment

paygrade E-2.

On 27 August 1997,

following a medical examination,
abuser, but not drug dependent.
out-patient treatment at an alcohol and drug rehabilitation
center.

you were found to be a drug
You were offered, but declined,

On 4 September 1997 you were notified of pending administrative
separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. At
that time you waived your rights to consult with legal counsel,
present your case to an administrative discharge board, and to
submit a statement in rebuttal to the discharge.
1997 your commanding officer recommended you be discharged under
other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to
drug abuse.
The recommendation noted, in part, that you were
incapable of adhering to the rules and regulations of the Navy
and that you were simply unwilling to conduct yourself in a
manner conducive to good order and discipline.

On 9 September

Subsequently, the discharge authority directed an other than
honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and
on 13 October 1997 you were so discharged.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity,
However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to
warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the
serious nature of your repetitive drug related misconduct and
your choice to decline an offer for rehabilitation treatment.
Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded
your discharge, was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.

and your post service conduct.

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00062

    Original file (ND00-00062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00062 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001013, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 841016: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). There is nothing in the applicant’s record to support a medical discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03147-02

    Original file (03147-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 12 August 1999, your proposed administrative separation was forwarded to the discharge authority recommending a general discharge, which was approved by the discharge authority on 7 You were so discharged on 9...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00018

    Original file (ND99-00018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 971224 under Other Than Honorable conditions for Misconduct due to Drug abuse (Use) (A and B). Relief denied.In the applicant’s issue 2, the Board found this issue to be without merit. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 16, effective 01 Jul 97 until [current]), Article 3630620 SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DRUG ABUSE B.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01829-03

    Original file (01829-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 1 April 1986, the separation authority directed that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and that prior to discharge, you be offered drug rehabilitation treatment at a Veterans Administration (VA) facility. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07314-01

    Original file (07314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You enlisted in the Navy on 3 August 1994 for four years at age 18.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01373-02

    Original file (01373-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record *and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. regard, the record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03274-02

    Original file (03274-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In your application you are requesting recharacterization of your discharge to honorable, a change in the reason for discharge and an RE-1 reenlistment code. He has no alcohol problems. Therefore, the Board found the evaluation was insufficient to overcome the diagnoses of alcohol dependence made prior to referral for alcohol rehabilitation, When you completed the inpatient rehabilitation program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01732-02

    Original file (01732-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, and the record of the two previous reviews of your application by the Board. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards dated 1 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. An SNMHAS record entry dated 12 August 1987 indicates...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03729-02

    Original file (03729-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Naval Military Personnel Command On 23 June Prior to your discharge on 23 June 1987, a Veterans Administration (VA)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01155-02

    Original file (01155-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In response to the draft action, on 11 March 1998 you submitted the following statement: I am aware of the consequences of this conviction in both the Naval Service and the Civil System and I accept full responsibility for my actions. On 14 December 1998 the Commander, Training Wing FIVE submitted a final Civil Action Report to Navy Personnel Command that stated, in part, as follows: This is not (LTJG M's; alcohol related incident February 1998 for a DUI offense on 22 July 1997 and...