Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08056-01
Original file (08056-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

REtORDS

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 8056-01
15 January 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

’s naval record

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 4 December 2001, a copy of which is attached.

’s naval record
In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

NA VY 

PERSONNEL 

COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON 

TN 38055-0000

Y

4 

Dee  01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

.

(a) BCNR memo of  
(b) 

5 Nov 01

DOD  Financial Management Regulation (Vol 7B)

Per reference (a),

1.
Chief Petty Officer
enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse category
coverage effective 22 July 1990.

recommend BCNR not correct

record to reflect that he

2.

The recommendation is based on the following:

a.

Chief Petty Officer

Reserve on 31 July 1981.
subsequently declined participation in SBP.

H

transferred to the Fleet
single at that time, and

b.

Chief Petty Officer

married on 22 July 1989.

and

were

C .

Per reference (b),

if a member with no eligible

dependents at the time of retirement later marries or
remarries he or she may within one year of that marriage
enroll their new spouse in SBP. The Defense Finance and
Accounting Service-Cleveland (DFAS-CL) indicates that Chief
Petty Officer
marriage.
assistance from the Casualty Assistance and Retired
Activities Division,
timeframe.

is no record that he requested

did provide documentation regarding his

PERS-62 here in Millington during that

There also

(the retirees'

II Shift Colors"

3 .
regularly provides information on various aspects of SBP.
as well as various periodicals from Navy
This newsletter,
fraternal organizations also provides SBP information to the
retired community on a routine basis.

Additionally,

quarterly newsletter)

PERS-62 and local Retired Activities Offices  
been available to provide information regarding SBP since
Chief Petty Officer

transfer to the Fleet Reserve.

(RAOs)  have

Admin Section

Casualty Assistance and
Retired Activities
Division (PERS-62)

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05581-01

    Original file (05581-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Branch, PERS-622 and local Retired Activities Offices have been available to provide specific information to Chief Since Chief...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02423-02

    Original file (02423-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He did not elect to enroll his Petty Officer was offered "Shift Colors" (the retirees' quarterly newsletter) regularly 3. provides...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08438-01

    Original file (08438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When you were divorced in November 1999 the court ordered you to furnish your former spouse with SBP coverage. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct Petty Officer -record changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage category within one year of his divorce. Additionally, a member who refuses coverage for an eligible spouse in favor of children only category is prohibited from electing spouse coverage at a later date...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02812-01

    Original file (02812-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 7 September 2001, a copy of which is attached. Senior Chief Petty Officer voluntarily changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05776-01

    Original file (05776-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. should have received a Chief Petty Office counting Service-Cleveland letter from the Defense Fi (DFAS-CL) within one month after he retired,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06133-03

    Original file (06133-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per .reference (a) , recommend BCNR not correct -record Benefit Plan (SBP).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03912-02

    Original file (03912-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the BCNR not correct record to reflect that he is entitled Plan (SBP) premiums beyond the 2. they had no previous record that he requested termination of his SBP participation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05755-01

    Original file (05755-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 1 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1448(b)(3), requires that SBP spouse coverage who become divorced and desire former spouses as their beneficiaries must participants with to maintain their specifically elect such coverage...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10865-02

    Original file (10865-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 10865-02 22 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07590-01

    Original file (07590-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. In response to reference (a), record to reflect that he enrolled in the Survivor lan (SBP) prior to transferring to the Fleet Reserve on recommend BCNR not correct PO1 5 November 1974. Public Law 92-425, which enacted SBP on 21 September 1972, provided that a retiree's participation in SBP at the maximum level was automatic unless...