DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 2057-01
9 April 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 5 April 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 3 January to 10 July 1985,
when you were discharged by reason of a personality disorder. You did not qualify for a
characterized discharge because separation processing was initiated while you were in an entry
level status, i.e., prior to your completion of 180 days of active duty service. The fact that
you were found physically qualified for enlistment in the Army Reserve in April 2000 was
insufficient to demonstrate that your discharge from the Navy was erroneous.
the Board noted that you did not undergo a psychiatric evaluation in connection with your
proposed enlistment in the Army Reserve, and you concealed significant information by
denying your history of attempted suicide in the Standard Form 93 you completed on 15 April
2000.
In this regard,
In view of the foregoing, and as you have not demonstrated that your discharge was erroneous,
the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
In this regard, it is
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05898-00
(BUMED) that you It was the Naval In addition, the Board noted that as you did not have a remaining reserve obligation The Board noted that a determination of your fitness for duty and entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy is under the cognizance of Disability Evaluation System (DES), rather than the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. case if the PEB had evaluated this member, she would have been found fit for continued active duty service. from active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05792-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09607-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 December 2000 at age 29 after being granted a medical waiver for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06100-01
considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. That form shows The statement of service also shows that you continued to serve in the Air Force Reserve until you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22 April 1996. Although an Air Force separation document states that your military obligation termination date was 30...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01744-01
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 April 2000 at age 19. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reason for discharge, given your drug use prior to your enlistment in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01151-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 2 and 10 May 2000, copies of which are attached. (1) with the following equests removal of two failures of select on the 2. basis that he was not aware that he would be eligible for consideration for promotion while in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) . We recommend that this case be forwarded to PERS-9 for an advisory opinion regarding the petitioner's status, in the event he requests...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07408-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are not recommended for retention or are discharged due to erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05181-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At that time you were On 12 June 2000 the Subsequently,, on 16 The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03972-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...