Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01151-00
Original file (01151-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

HD:hd
Docket No: 0115 l-00
9 February 2001

_-

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated
2 and 10 May 2000, copies of which are attached.

the
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the advisory opinion
dated 10 May 2000. They were unable to find you reasonably relied on incorrect
information from personnel at the Naval Reserve Personnel Center. In this regard, they
noted you provided no statement from the source of the alleged incorrect counseling,

In

view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

.-

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosures

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY  l  IRlOWWlL COMMAND
DRIVE
57tO  
YlLLllDTOl
3805s0000

lITEQUItY  

TN 

 

142 0
PERS-86

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Encl:

Assistant for BCNR Matters 

(PERS-OOZCB)

__

REQUEST IC

SNR

(1) BCNR File 00220-00 w/Service Record

We are returning enclosure  
1.
observations and recommendations.

(1)  with the following

equests

removal of two failures of select on the

2.
basis that he was not aware that he would be eligible for
consideration for promotion while in the Individual Ready Reserve
(IRR)  .
He states that he sought guidance from the NAVRESPERCEN
IRR help desk and received improper guidance.

We recommend forwarding this case to NAVRESPERCEN for an

3.
opinion regarding the alleged improper guidance.

In the event that NAVRESPERSCEN determines that improper

4.
guidance was given we would consider recommending removal of the
failures.

However,

mere removal of the failures of select will not
5.
provide the relief sought in this case because, in our opinion,

record will not be competitive for promotion without

Not only must the failures be

observed reports of fitness.
removed,--

but reports of fitness must also be made available.

Since reports of fitness are not available, then the only

6.
relief that may be granted is to provide a period of additional
time that the petitioner can drill as a member of the Selected
Reserve.
Such action can only be possible if the petitioner
requests the further relief of having the record corrected to
show that he was assigned to the Inactive Reserve (S-2) during a
period of time not to exceed three to four years, and a date of
rank adjustment per 10 USC 
constructive reinstatement on the Reserve Active Status-iist. We
recommend that this case be forwarded to PERS-9 for an advisory
opinion regarding the petitioner's status, in the event he
requests further relief.

5 741(d) (3) upon the resultant

In the event tha

granted,further

7.
relief as discussed above, he would then have the opportunity to
return to a drilling status,
may make his record competitive for promotion.

and obtain reports of fitness that

requests and is  

rve Officer

Promotions,
Enlisted Advancement Division

Appointments, and

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY 

PERSONNEL  

COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN  

38055-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:

-REQUEST

FOR COMMENTS

Ref:

(a)
(b)
(c)

BCNR memo
Title 10,
Title 10,

5420
U.S.
U.S.

PERS-OOZCB of
Code, Section
Code, Section

20 March
12465
14505

Encl:

(1) BCNR File No. 01151-00

co

00

Per reference (
1.
petition be denied.
recommendation that
requesting retention in the Naval Reserve vice statutory
separation due to multiple failures of selection.

e

(1) is returned with the

573 0
PERS-911
10 May 00

S

record shows that he was commissioned a Naval

2.
Reserve officer in October 1988 and served on active duty from
October 1988 through March 1993.
he was assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve 
of the Ready Reserve and was placed on the Reserve Active Status
List (RASL).
considered by both the FY-99
selection boards and failed of
subsequently discharged on 1 April 2000 due to multiple failures
of selection for promotion.

as appropriately
tenant commander
0th  times.

While on the 

Upon release from active duty,

He was

RAS

an

(IRR)  component

Reference 

(b)  requires that all members of the Ready

3.
,_including  IRR members,
Reserve
regardless of their participation.
boards are published by ALNAV message, as are the results of the
boards.
eligibility before a promotion board.
individual officer's responsibility to  
for promotion,
status

Naval officers are not individually notified of

be considered for promotion
The zones for promotion

It is ultimately the
be  aware of his Reserve
and to plan accordingly.
of*the  Ready Reserve since leaving

as been a member 

and eligibility

active duty and was therefore eligible for consideration by both
promotion boards.

.
-

. 

Subj:

TIONS ICO

Per reference (c),

4 .
failed of selection for promotion and has completed his 
year military service obligation must transfer to the Retired
Reserve,

if eligible and requested, or be discharged.

a lieutenant who has at least twice

ad earned only five years of qualifying service, he
gible
was honorably discharged from the Naval Reserve on 1

for transfer to the Retired Reserve and

therefore,
April 2000.

eight-

Because

--

Regretfully,
spi.tk  of his excellent record.

5.
in 
in this case.
Commanding Officer,
regarding the alleged erroneous counseling.

we were required by law to discharge

We find no error o
We recommend that his case be forwarded to

Naval Reserve Personnel Center for comment

My point

6.
this case

of contact for further information pertaining to

at (9

. Naval Reserve

Director,
Administration Division

Naval Reserve Personnel



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02507-01

    Original file (02507-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 99 and 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Boards; that you be granted a special selection board for FY 99; that your discharge of 31 March 2000 from the Naval Reserve be set aside; that you be reinstated to the Inactive Status List lieutenant, with a date of rank adjustment to reflect seniority as if you had been placed on the ISL on 1 June 1998; and that your 16 June 1995 completion of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01

    Original file (02243-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08156-00

    Original file (08156-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    sine Chapter 15 contains the responsibilities “Each officer is responsible for ensuring Paragraph 15-5 states; “A ll officers should periodically review their official If eligible for consideration by a selection board, this review should be co months prior to the convening date to allow time for correction of discrepancies. Per reference (a), enclosure at former s requesting to have his honorable discharge (1) is returned with the petition be denied. time of his honorable discharge A...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07117-00

    Original file (07117-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. as a Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve since the date of his commission and therefore was never eligible for a date of rank adjustment. e Active Status List erved continuously activ Reserve...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05662-00

    Original file (05662-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found that even if you had been considered by the Mobilization Disposition Board, and you had been - Inactive status as a result of approval of a board occurred until after the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Board had adjourned. recommendation again th is requesting removal 0 promotion to lieutenant original opinion stating that he transferred to Standby 19 May 1999 Naval Reserve Officer Mobilization Disposition Board. tha would have been a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00451-01

    Original file (00451-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This provision allows a member section 741(d) (3) only We recommend Lieutena 3. transferring to the IRR i FY-02 Naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-00

    Original file (08299-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested correction of your record to show your voluntary resignation from the Naval Reserve on 30 June 1991, rather than involuntary discharge on 31 December 1994 by reason of two failures of selection to lieutenant commander. his in All members of the Ready Reserve, including IRR members, are 4. required by law to be considered by promotion selection boards, whether or not they are actively participating. It was during this time that he stopped active participation with his unit,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03638-02

    Original file (03638-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    following comments and recommendation concerning request that her date of transfer to Standby Reserve-Inactive (USNR-S2) status be changed from 31 August 2000 to 1997 and all failures of selection that date be removed. After her release from active duty, she entered the Individual Ready Reserve the Naval Reserve. Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, regardless of their active participation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03920-00

    Original file (03920-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06470-00

    Original file (06470-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your request for a special selection board was not considered, as you were selected by the FY 02 promotion board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. They noted that according to paragraph 3 of this opinion, your fitness report for 1 October 1998 to 31 October 1999 was missing from your record when you were considered by the...