DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX REC
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 Docket No: 00327-09
22 October 2009
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj _ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Sigil
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
: Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with SC UBERMEntS
, (2) Case summary ’
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be
changed.
es
2. The Board, consisting of Vegi ; en.
—.. reviewed Petitioner's allegatio 8. of error and injustice
-on 21 October 2009 and, pursuant to its. regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material °
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, navel
records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
fands as follows:
a. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 16 November 1999, at
age 18 and served without disciplinary incident. Her
performance evaluations through August 2000 reflected
satisfactory performance. Her final evaluation was positive and
she was recommended for retention.
b. On 7 August 2000, Petitioner was notified of
administrative separation action due to her nonavailability for
deployment due to custody of a minor child. On 27 September
2000, Petitioner was honorably discharged by reason of
parenthood and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
c. An RE-3B reenlistment code may be ‘assigned to Sailors
separated due to parenthood, pregnancy, and/or childbirth. This
code may not bar reenlistment, but requires that a waiver be
obtained. Recruiting personnel are responsible for determining
whether an individual meets the standards for reenlistment, and
whether or not a request for a waiver of a reenlistment code is
feasible. A Sailor separated for this reason may also receive
an RE-4 reenlistment code, which means that he or she is not
recommended for reenlistment.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action based on Petitioner's overall record, which includes no
disciplinary infractions and satisfactory duty performance.
Since an RE-3B reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory _
guidance for a Sailor who is separated by reason of .parenthood,
the Board concludes that the interest of justice would better be
better served by changing Petitioner’s RE-4 reenlistment code to
Re-3B rather than the RE-4 now of record.
-RECOMMENDAT ION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing
the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 27 September 2000, to
RE-3B.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or .
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4, It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN . BRIAN Sane) Haag GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of)
Naval Records (32 Code of Pederal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Executive Dinect
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05172-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5172-08 5 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. e. On 6 February 2008 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted her service record and an RE-3B reenlistment code. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07126-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. e. In August 1988 Petitioner was administratively processed for separation by reason of pregnancy/childbirth due to her inability to comply with the NFC policy program. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing ~ the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 5 August 1988, to RE-3B.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10755-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed. Nevertheless, she was administratively processed for separation by reason of parenthood due to her inability to comply with the NFC program. On 23 February 2004 the discharge authority, Navy Personnel Command (NPC), directed a reenlistment code of RE-3B, or a RE-4, if warranted by the service record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13656-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with Ghd Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. Since an RE-3B reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance for a Sailor who is separated for this reason, the Board concludes that an RE-3B reenlistment code is more appropriate than the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06682-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 06682-08 19 May 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 3m Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In Petitioner’s case, her RE-4 reenlistment code was not warranted based on her overall evaluations and her separation code should have been JDG for parenthood. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07857-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 February 2000. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the assignment of the RE-3B reenlistment code. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01493-08
The Board, consisting of Mr. ¥ Ms. MMe, and Ms. * reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In Petitioner’s case, her RE-4 reenlistment code was not warranted based on her overall evaluations. Therefore, the Board concludes that an RE-3B reenlistment code which is authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04620-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted membr of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 11 June 1997. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc, Ms. Gilbert, and Mr. Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02760-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show thata better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 27 December 1999.2. In connection with this processing, she elected to waive the right to have her case heard by an administrative discharge board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-3B or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06341-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 ELP Docket No 6341-01 29 January 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in...