DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No:
18 December 2002
1967-02
This is in refer
to your application for correction of your
isions of Title 10 of the United
A three-member p
application on 17
injustice were re
regulations and p
Documenta
Board.
your application,
thereof, your nava
and policies.
of the Board for Correction of Naval
executive session, considered your
ecember 2002.
ewed in accordance with administrative
cedures applicable to the proceedings of this
material considered by the Board consisted of
ogether with all material submitted in support
record and applicable statutes, regulations
Your allegations of error and
nsideration of the entire
nd that the evidence submitted was
lish the existence of probable material
avy on 11 April 2000 at age 19.
unishment on 8 December 2000 for an unknown
, you were processed for an administrative
misconduct due to drug abuse.
On 15 April
You
a general discharge by reason of misconduct.
nowledged that you were not
recoxmnended for
r drug abuse and were assigned an RR-4
lication the Board carefully weighed all
such as your initial period of
onsidered and your contentions
reenlistment code.
good service.
that you only used
teroids so you could qualify as a Navy SEAL,
factors and contentions were
terization of your discharge.
roids was considered to be drug
ntentions were considered when the
general discharge, since a
rable conditions is authorized and
normally issued whe
misconduct.
an individual is separated by reason of
The Board concluded that the discharge was proper as
issued and no
than
Regulations requir
when an individual
you have been trea
situation, the Boa
assignment of the
-e is warranted.
the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
s discharged by reason of misconduct.
no differently than others in your
could not find an error or injustice in the
-4 reenlistment code.
Since
pplication has been denied.
The names and
f the panel will be furnished upon request.
ble to have your case heard by the Naval
lete the enclosed application, DD Form 293,
address indicated on the form.
if you have not already done
e circumstances of your case are such that
Accordingly,
votes of the
You are still eli
Discharge Revie
so, you should
and sent it to t
It is regret
favorable ac
recons
Board
evidence or other
In this regard, i
presumption
Consequently, whe
record, the burde
existence of prob
Enclosure
s important to keep in mind that a
You are entitled to have the
submission of new and material
ously considered by the Board.
to all official records.
correction of an official naval
is on the applicant to demonstrate the
le material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02367-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10245-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation was approved and on 1 June 2001 you received an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08181-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you have been treated no differently than others separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04234-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2002. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00580-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 23 February 1988 for three years. The Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code since you were treated no differently than others discharged under similar circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04612-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged because of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04373-01
considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Further, the Board noted the aggravating factor that you waived an ADB, the one opportunity you had to show why you should be retained or discharged under honorable conditions. require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to indivi- The duals discharged by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07316-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Even though you were recommended for retention, The Board concluded that the discharge by Concerning the nonrecommendation for reenlistment, which equates to an RE-4 reenlistment code, Navy regulations require such...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03737-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. fully supported the other than honorable discharge, based on the positive urinalysis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00607-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...