Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01757-02
Original file (01757-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JRE
Docket No: 1757-02
14 November 2002

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

FORMER
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a)

10 

U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)

DD Form 149
Subject’s naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to
show that he was retired by reason of physical disability or pursuant to the Temporary Early
Retirement Authority  

(TERA).

.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Moidel and Messrs. Bishop and Geisler reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 September 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

c. On 5 September 1995, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined that
Petitioner was unfit for duty because of a right knee condition, bilateral knee pain, and
obstructive sleep apnea. He was released from active duty on 16 November 1995 and
transferred to the Temporary Disability Retired List. He completed 19 years, 4 months and
19 days of active duty service. He was reevaluated by the PEB on 7 November 2000. His
rating was decreased to  
unfitting or ratable. On 30 November 2000, the President, Physical Evaluation Board,
directed that he be discharged  by reason of physical disability, with entitlement to disability
severance pay.

20%, as the sleep apnea had improved, and was no longer considered

cl.

Petitioner contends, in effect, that he was under the impression that because of his

m ited duty status until he completed 20 years of active duty

previous period of limited duty, and the fact that he had obstructive sleep apnea, he could not
re m ain on active duty in a li
service.
In addition, he was advised that while on the TDRL, his retired pay would exceed
that which he would have received had he opted for retirement pursuant to TERA in lieu of
placement on the TDRL, and that he would qualify for TERA in the event his disability rating
was decreased below 30
had nothing to lose by electing to be transferred to the TDRL in lieu of transfer
Reserve. He subsequently learned that he could have requested retention on active duty in a
li m ited duty status until he completed 20 years of service. In addition, he was ultimately
denied military retire
Navy when his name was removed from the TDRL in

ment, because the TERA program was no longer being funded by the

%  and name removed from the TDRL. Given that advice, he felt he

to the Fleet

2OOCl.

 

 

CONCLUS

ION :

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that had
Petitioner been properly advised, he would have requested to remain on active duty in a
li m ited duty status until he had completed 20 years of active duty service.
of his disabilities, and his excellent record of service, it is likely that his request would have
been granted. The Board concluded that in view of the unique circumstances of this case, it
would be in the interest of justice to correct Petitioner
transferred to the Fleet Reserve pursuant to the TERA at the conclusion of his tenure on the
TDRL .

Given the nature

’s record to show that he was

RECOMMENDAT

ION :

a. That Petitioner

’s naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged by

reason of physical disability.

b. That Petitioner

’s naval record be further corrected to show that on 1 December

2000, he was transferred to the Fleet Reserve pursuant to the Temporary Early Retirement
Authority.

C. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board
record of the Board

’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D . ZSAL MAN
Recorder

5.
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board
on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Executive Direct



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07633-08

    Original file (07633-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, as amended, that his naval record be- corrected to show that he wag retired by pursuant to the Temporary Early Retirement Authority vice discharged by reason of physical disability. He was advised by the President, PEB, on 6 January 1995, in effect, that he was being placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a rating below 30%, he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07081-09

    Original file (07081-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect and as amended, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Fleet Reserve pursuant to the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) effective 1 February 2000, vice being discharged with entitlement to disability severance pay on 25 January 2000. Prior to his transfer to the TDRL he was advised by the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02989-06

    Original file (02989-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show , in effect, that he transferred to the Fleet Reserve pursuant to the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) effective 1 June 1997, vice being discharged with entitlement to disability severance pay on 19 May 1997. d. DOD Instruction 1332, section E3.P7.2.1.1 provides that members...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03199-01

    Original file (03199-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting, in effect, to show that he was transferred to the Fleet Reserve under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) vice being discharged on 22 January 2001. that his naval record be corrected filed enclosure (1) with this 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Kastner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01278-01

    Original file (01278-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was retired under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority discharged by reason of physical disability. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that, in view Petitioner ’s extensive period of creditable active duty service, and the advice...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00192

    Original file (PD2009-00192.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    In 2002 the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined she was unfit for continued naval service secondary to Major Depressive Disorder. A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) was done and in 1997 the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined she should enter the TDRL with a rating of 30%. She was on medication at every evaluation performed by the VA and the Navy except for her third TDRL evaluation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00371

    Original file (BC-2003-00371.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. Following DPPD’s assessment, they conclude the applicant was treated fairly throughout the military Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, that he was properly rated under federal disability guidelines at the time of his evaluation, and that he was afforded the opportunity for further review as provided by federal law and policy. As...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00539

    Original file (PD2010-00539.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    All evidence considered, the Board unanimously recommends a 10% permanent disability rating for the LBP condition. In the matter of the OSA condition, the Board unanimously recommends an initial TDRL rating of 50%, and a permanent separation rating of 50%, coded 6847 IAW VASRD §4.97. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record President Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency SUBJECT:...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01914

    Original file (PD2012 01914.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At TDRL entry, the PEB adjudicated the CI’s asthma condition as unfitting, and coded 6602 (bronchial asthma) at 30%.The Board deliberated whether the CI’s asthma condition met the 30%, or the 60% 6602 rating at the time of TDRL entry. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08271-98

    Original file (08271-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was separated or retired by reason of physical disability. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner and Molzahn and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...