DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
6 December 2002
5144-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 4 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof,
your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
materi'al considered by the Board consisted
Documentary
considered your
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You served without incident until 6 March 1985, when
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 22 July 1983 at
age 18 .
you received nonjudicial punishment
making and uttering checks without sufficient funds.
The
punishment imposed was forfeitures of $100 per month for two
months, 15 days of extra duty and a reduction in rate.
(NJP) for five instances of
On 19 December 1985 you received NJP for failure to pay just
debts.
for two months and 30 days of restriction.
you again received NJP for false official statement.
punishment imposed was a reduction in rate.
The punishment imposed was forfeitures of $100 per month
On 30 January 1986
The
Your record further shows that you received NJP for 21 days of
unauthorized absence from 4 to 25 March 1986 and missing ship's
movement.
month for two months, 45 days of restriction and extra duty, and
a reduction in rate.
The punishment imposed was forfeitures of $300 per
On 16 June 1986, you were notified that separation action was
being initiated by reason of misconduct due to the commission of
a serious offense.
and elected to consult counsel prior to electing or waiving your
procedural rights.
counsel, you elected to waive the right to present your case to
an administrative discharge board.
On 15 August 1986, after consulting with
You were advised of your procedural rights
On 15 August 1986 your commanding officer forwarded your
discharge package to the Naval Military Personnel Command
recommending an other than honorable discharge.
1986 NMPC approved the commanding officer's recommendation and
directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of
misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
1986, you were so discharged.
(NMPC)
On 14 September
On 7 October
However, the
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and
immaturity.
commission of a serious offense was appropriate based on your
four
irresponsibility and unauthorized absence.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
NJP's, all of which were related to your financial
.Board concluded that misconduct due to
The names and votes of the members
Accordingly, your
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03627-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04449-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Your record further reflects that on 4 February 1986 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of absence from your appointed place of duty, breaking...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09184-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 October 1985 at age 18 and served without disciplinary incident until 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04638-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 January 1985 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for larceny and were awarded a $300 forfeiture of pay, a portion of which was suspended for six months. Shortly thereafter, on 28 October 1987, you received The reduction and forfeitures were suspended for six The punishment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02392-09
RK three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2010. Documentary material congidered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 March 1988 you received NUP for two periods of UA totalling two days, failure to obey a lawful order, and four periods of absence from...
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00897
Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040401. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Applicant’s resumé Applicant’s statement/explanation of issues (11 pages) Letter to Board for Correction of Naval Records, dated February 21, 2003 Character reference form Captain, US Navy (Ret. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04906-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08177-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You then reenlisted for six years on 9 March The record reflects that you were advanced to TM2 (E-5) on 16 January 1980 and served without incident until 6 May 1982 when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05421-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00133
851206: Placed on limited duty by Medical Board, Naval Hospital Bethesda, MD until 860402, at which time he will be reevaluated. No indication of appeal in the record860414: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.860501: SNM placed on second period of limited duty by Medical Board, Naval Hospital Bethesda until 861101. 860624: An Administrative Discharge Board,...