DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
11 July 2002
1027-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 July 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and
Board.
of your application,
support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
procedures*applicable to the proceedings of this
together with all material submitted in
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 5 August 1986 for four years
at age 17.
incident until 7 April 1988 when you received non-judicial
punishment (NJP) for a false official statement.
imposed was a forfeiture of $182.
Your record reflects that you served without
The punishment
Between 16 May and 10 Aug 1988 you were not recommended for
advancement to Corporal (CPL) due to your recent NJP,
irresponsibility, and immaturity.
administrative remarks warning concerning driving on a suspended
driver's license and the loss of your base driving privileges
for one year.
Additionally, you received an
On 4 April 1989, you received an administrative remarks warning
concerning your failure to be at your appointed place of duty on
Your record further reflects that you were an
2 April 1989.
unauthorized absentee on 24 January 1990, however, the record
does not reflect that any action was taken concerning this
incident.
On 1 May 1990 you again received an adverse administrative
remarks entry stating that you were not recommended for
advancement to CPL due to your substandard performance.
May 1990 you received NJP for failure to be at your appointed
place of duty.
and 14 days of restriction and extra duty.
The punishment imposed was a forfeiture of $207
On 23
On 5 August 1990, you were honorably released from active duty
and transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve.
were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
received an honorable discharge upon completion of your military
obligation.
At that time you
On 20 August 1993, you
NJP's and numerous adverse
The Board concluded that your two
administrative remarks entries provided sufficient justification
to warrant a non-recommendation for reenlistment and the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
concluded that the reenlistment code was proper and no change is
warranted.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The Board thus
The
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07476-01
Punishment imposed consisted of a suspended On 25 April 1995 you were notified that administrative separation action was being initiated to discharge you under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and commission of a serious offense. present your case to an administrative discharge board You appeared before an ADB with counsel on 14 August 1995. The found you had committed misconduct due to ADB, by a vote of 3-0, a pattern of misconduct and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03535-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that the other than honorable discharge was appropriate given your request for discharge in lieu of trial for two instances of assault, breach of the peace, wrongful use of marijuana, believed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09424-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you did not appeal your NUPs or submit rebuttal statements to your substandard performance evaluations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10268-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval’ Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Asa result, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for underage drinking,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02221-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The execution of all punishment was On 16 December 1985 you were advanced to first class petty officer (E-6) and on 21 July 1986 you extended your enlistment for a period of 27 months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06467-08
Documentary material considered by the Board: consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your daughter’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You served without disciplinary incident until 15 July 1989, when you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9802032
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 1999. Further, an individual separated by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure must receive an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02832-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, an individual separated by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure must receive an RE-4 reenlistment code.
USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00986
Its been 12 years roughly since I have been discharged with an other than honorable discharge without my last qualification on the rifle range wasn't on my DD214 and neither did I receive my accrued days of leave time that was at least 2 1/2 months worth. This is not only irresponsible but a blatant disregard for military authority by failing to comply with a direct order. 900831: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05094-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. July 1990 you were honorably released from active duty at the expiration of your enlistment and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...