DEPARTMENT,OF
TkE NAVY
CORRECTI& OF NAVAL RECORD
BOARD FOR
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
CRS
Docket No: 3752-00
16 July 2001
Section 1552.
Your allegations of error and
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 3 July
1972 at age 18.
nonjudicial punishments.
absences totalling five days.
A special court-martial convened on 8 January 1974 and you were
found guilty of unauthorized absences totalling 206 days.
The
court sentenced you to confinement at hard labor for two months,
forfeitures of $100 per month for two months, and a bad conduct
discharge.
You received the bad conduct discharge on 15 August
1974.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
such as your youth and immaturity
and personal problems.
factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences
totalled about seven months.
The Board also noted that during a
period of less than three years,
The record reflects that you received two
However, the Board concluded that these
The offenses included unauthorized
you were the subject of three
DEPARTMENT OF
TH;E NAVY
linary
1.
to the discharge
action8~A?Pli~~ti&~!
Based on the fore
%!8fhS
iication has been denied.
hffT$N&rW~&WflR~ special
court-
',"!!h% Board concluded that no
~~~c?iw
your
&%! 4
~e%'?70-%&ordingly,
The names and votes of the membe
rs
of-the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
.
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02116-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06564-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. A second special court-martial convened on 29 October 1973 and you were found guilty of unauthorized absences totalling 7.9 days. factors were not sufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02152-01
Your allegations of error and Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that these factors...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06404-00
6404-00 11 June 2001 Dear This is in reference to naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. y'our application for correction of your A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05560-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to.the fact that your unauthorized absences totalled nearly Accordingly, your Based on the foregoing,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07295-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences totalled more You received the bad conduct discharge The court sentenced you to xordingly, your application...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02171-01
Board also noted that the initial sentence to a bad conduct discharge was suspended, better discharge. which resulted in the discharge being executed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08395-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct and especially the special court-martial conviction for 47 days of unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04900-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. included an unauthorized absence of 24 days and drunk and disorderly conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04043-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nine days later, you began another period of unauthorized absence that lasted until Your military record you were apprehended on 5 August 1974. shows that you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for these two periods of...