Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08642-00
Original file (08642-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

 

NA\‘AL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370 510

0

TRG
Docket No:
5 June 2001

8642-00

applicat:.on for correction of your
This is in reference to your  
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,. considered your
application on 30 May 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You satisfactorily  

izhe Navy on 14 January 1980
complei:ed  initial training and on

The Board found that you enlisted in  
at age 18.
On 20
28 May 1980 you reported to your  
February 1981 you began a period of unauthorized absence which
lasted until you were apprehended on  
court-martial convened on 11 March 19136 and convicted you of the
foregoing period of unauthorized absence totaling about five
years.
forfeiture of $350 pay per month for  
hard labor for 60 days and a bad conduct discharge.
that you began appellate leave on 28  
that status until the bad conduct discharge was issued on 20
April 1987.

six months, confinement at
It appears
Idarch 1986 and remained in

The court sentenced you to reduction to pay grade E-l,

firsi: duty station.

ILO February 1986.

A special

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
as your youth, your belief
potentially mitigating factors,
that you have been adequately punished for your offenses by
having a bad conduct discharge for over 14 years, and your claim
that you have been a good citizen for many years.
found that these factors were not  
recharacterization of your discharge given your lengthy period of

suf:?icient  to warrant

The Board

such 

authorized absence.
proper as issued and no change is warranted.

The Board concluded that the discharge was

The names and

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel  
wil:L be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstance:: of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not  
previous.Ly considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a  
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error  

cor.rection of an official naval

Ior injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05699-01

    Original file (05699-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary The Board found record, especially the special court-martial conviction for a lengthy period of unauthorized...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02287-01

    Original file (02287-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05160-00

    Original file (05160-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 9 May 1986 you received nonjudicial of,about nine days and The punishment Your military record shows that you submitted a written On 12 May 1986 you began a period of unauthorized absence which lasted until you surrendered on 25 June 1986, a period of about 44 days. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05292-08

    Original file (05292-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You began appellate leave on 18 June 1986 and remained in that status until the bad conduct discharge was issued on 9 March 1987.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03947-01

    Original file (03947-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, while the administrative discharge recommendation was being processed, you began another series of unauthorized absences. During the period 25 April to 1 July 1980 you were an unauthorized absentee on three occasions totaling about 35 days.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03162-02

    Original file (03162-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated and lengthy periods of unauthorized The Board-found that these factors and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02653-10

    Original file (02653-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of the foregoing, on 28 August 1986, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09476-07

    Original file (09476-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 23 May 1979 at age 20 after about six months of service in the Army...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08579-06

    Original file (08579-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02159-07

    Original file (02159-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 October 1979 at age 19. On 20 April 1981, you escaped~ from...