Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08189-00
Original file (08189-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAJAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TJR
Docket No: 8189-00
11 June 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provision:; of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 June 2001..
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable
Board.
your application, together with all  
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.

':o the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of

material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found you enlisted in the  
Ma.rine Corps on 29 November
Your record  
re.flects  that you served for
1963 at the age of 17.
a year and three months without  
discip.Linary  incident but on 10
April 1965 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for absence
from your appointed place of duty and  
bread and water for three days and a $16 forfeiture of pay. On
10 April 1965 you received NJP for theft and disobedience.
punishment imposed was reduction to  
forfeiture of pay.
to go to your appointed
special court-martial (SPCM) of failure
place of duty and were sentenced to hard labor for a month and a
$60 forfeiture of pay. Shortly thereafter, on 1 July 1975, you
applointed  place of duty and
received NJP for absence from your  
On 20 December
were awarded correctional custody for  
1965 you were convicted by civil authorities of possession of a
dangerous weapon and unauthorized use  
Iof a private automobile.
You were sentenced to a  
'court costs.
$llOO fine and 

On 30 April 1965 you were convicted by

pa:yrgrade  E-l and an $80

20 days.

'Rere awarded confinement on

The

21 April 1966 you received
Your record further reflects that on  
NJP for absence from your appointed place of duty and failure to
obey a lawful order.
paygrade E-l and restriction for 15  
convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of disobedience and were
sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 20 days and a $70
forfeiture of pay.
During the period from 31 May to 22 September
1966 you were convicted by SPCM of escape and you received NJP on
two occasions for disorderly conduct  

The punishment imposed was reduction to

:and sleeping on post.

On 4 May 1966 you were

d

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04154-01

    Original file (04154-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    months later, on 2 and 9 May 1967, you received NJP for a two day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and breaking restriction. Approximately five Your record further reflects that on 16 January 1968 you were convicted by SPCM of four periods of UA totalling 155 days. Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a correction of your naval record given your seven periods of UA totalling 166 days and your three periods of confinement which that your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10683-07

    Original file (10683-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 19 January 1966, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 20. On 19 July 1966, you began an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03888-02

    Original file (03888-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, of UA were the result of getting married and your wife...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10343-02

    Original file (10343-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 October 1966 you were convicted by SPCM of a 67 day period of UA and were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for six months, a $342...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04158-02

    Original file (04158-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10683-07

    Original file (10683-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 June 1967, while on ‘probation, you began a UA that ended about 187 days later when you surrendered. On 9 February 1968, the suspended sentence was vacated and the BCD was ordered executed. On 16 February 1968, you were discharged with a BCD.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04596-00

    Original file (04596-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. January 1968 you received NJP for a 14 day period of UA and were awarded a $20 forfeiture of pay. Given the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06399-01

    Original file (06399-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 9 May 1968 you were convicted by special martial (SPCM) of an 86 day period of UA and were awarded confinement at hard labor for five months and a $450...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00676-03

    Original file (00676-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was ~ insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. were convicted by summary court martial (SCM) of instances of disobedience of a superior officer and sentenced to fifteen days of confinement at hard labor and a forfeiture of pay. I July~l963...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04465-01

    Original file (04465-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The record does not indicate if any disciplinary action was taken for this period of UA. good post service conduct, and your However, the Board concluded these...