Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01806-01
Original file (01806-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD 

FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 
. 19 June 2001

1806-01

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 19 June 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 913 of 17 May 2001, a copy of which
is attached.

Your allegations of error and injustice

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

D,_PARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

5420
PERS-913
17 May 01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-OOZCB

NDATION IN THE CASE OF

Ref:

(a) Title 10, U.S. C. 1552
(b) BUPERSINST  

1001.39(series)

Encl:

(1) BCNR File 1806-01

Enclosure (1) is forwarded with the following comments and

1.
recommendations:

a.

We do not supp
records indicates that
on 12 March 2000.
to remain in a drill pay status until 31 December  

Per reference

etition.

eached  High Year Tenure  

(bm was authorized

A review of his
(HYT)

2000.

quested a High Year Tenure waiver to remain

Regretfully, his

beyond 31 December 2000.

in a pay status
request was denied due, to the fact that his rating was manned in
,W  states that he was he was in the
excess of 100%.
Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) from 1974 to 1980 and did not earn
any qualifying years of service.
will not be able to complete 20 years of qualifying service to
earn a non-regular retirement, also known as a reserve
retirement.

Additionally,

he states that he

B.

b.

may drill in a Volunteer Training Unit (VTU)

or transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve
retirement points via drills or correspondence courses to attain
20 qualifying years for a Non-Regular Reserve Retirement.
Additionally,
to earn retirement points for qualifying years for a non-regular
retirement but failed to do so of his own accord.

while in the IRR from 1974 to 1980 he was eligible

(IRR)  and earn

 

Additional questions may be directed to LCDR

2.
(901) 874-4501.

at

Director,
Administration Division

Naval Reserve Personnel



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01

    Original file (02243-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-00

    Original file (08299-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested correction of your record to show your voluntary resignation from the Naval Reserve on 30 June 1991, rather than involuntary discharge on 31 December 1994 by reason of two failures of selection to lieutenant commander. his in All members of the Ready Reserve, including IRR members, are 4. required by law to be considered by promotion selection boards, whether or not they are actively participating. It was during this time that he stopped active participation with his unit,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06215-01

    Original file (06215-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Our letter, s not physically qualified and directed Naval not physically disk on 27 Jan 00, "inform member in writing of reference (d), stated Reference Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF b. In response to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5041 14

    Original file (NR5041 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In March 2014, Petitioner submitted a request to BCNR to show that he completed 20 years of qualifying service in the Navy Reserve and to receive a non-regular Reserve retirement at age 60, enclosure (1). Accordingly, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to show that Petitioner had a Satisfactory year from 3 January 1970 through 2 January 1971, and was eligible for a non-regular Navy Reserve Retirement without pay on 1 October 1993 with 20 years of Satisfactory service. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01151-00

    Original file (01151-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 2 and 10 May 2000, copies of which are attached. (1) with the following equests removal of two failures of select on the 2. basis that he was not aware that he would be eligible for consideration for promotion while in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) . We recommend that this case be forwarded to PERS-9 for an advisory opinion regarding the petitioner's status, in the event he requests...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01591-01

    Original file (01591-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 6 May 1998 Naval Reserve Center, Cape Girardeau requested a review of his status by the President, Physical Evaluation Board.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02507-01

    Original file (02507-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 99 and 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Boards; that you be granted a special selection board for FY 99; that your discharge of 31 March 2000 from the Naval Reserve be set aside; that you be reinstated to the Inactive Status List lieutenant, with a date of rank adjustment to reflect seniority as if you had been placed on the ISL on 1 June 1998; and that your 16 June 1995 completion of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08156-00

    Original file (08156-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    sine Chapter 15 contains the responsibilities “Each officer is responsible for ensuring Paragraph 15-5 states; “A ll officers should periodically review their official If eligible for consideration by a selection board, this review should be co months prior to the convening date to allow time for correction of discrepancies. Per reference (a), enclosure at former s requesting to have his honorable discharge (1) is returned with the petition be denied. time of his honorable discharge A...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001

    i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 01725-98

    Original file (01725-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by giving him retirement point credit for his Naval Reserve participation during the period 10 August 1959 to 12 March 1962. The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. McCulloch and Molzahn, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 August 1999, and pursuant to...