Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05726-06
Original file (05726-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00


 HD:hd
Docket No. 05726-06
16 July 2007




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 5 January 2007 with enclosure and 26 March 2Q07, copies of which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinions. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.














It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep min d that a presumption of regularity attaches
 to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official nava l record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
 Executive Di rector






Enclosures
























DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

                                              5812
                                                                                                             PERS-4832B
                                                                                                            5 Jan 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR THE       EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)
Via:     PERS/BCNR Coordinator (PERS-31C)
Subj:   

Ref:     (a) MILPERSMAN 1160-030
                   (b) MILPERSMAN 1616-030
End:     (1) BCNR File 05726-06
(2) Petitioner’s CD Service Record

 1.       The petition and naval records of subject petitioner have been reviewed relative to his request for removal of derogatory evaluation and reinstatement of enlistment eligibility.
2.       The review reveals that the petitioner was convicted at a SPCM which precludes reenlistment eligibility within one year in accordance with reference (a). Subsequent to the SPCM, this office authorized denial of reenlistment in accordance with reference (b) . Therefore, favorable action on this petition is not recommended. Also, it is recommended that this petition be forwarded to the Enlisted Evaluations Section (PERS-311) regarding the performance evaluation issue.


Techni~1 Advisor to the
 Head, Enlisted Performance and
Separations Section (PERS-4832)
—         —~____  




































         DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMMANDING OFFPCER
NAVAL SIJBMARINE SUPPORT CENTER
580 USS MARIANO 6. VALIEJO AVENUE
 -         KINGS BAY, GA 31547.2626
          l6l6
Ser 00/084 26 Jun 06
From:    Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine Support Center, Kings Bay, Georgia
To:      Commander, Navy Personnel Command (PERS-4832)
Subj DENIAL OF REENLISTMENT RECOMMENDATION

Ref:     (a) NIILPERSMANl61 - 030
 ( b) OPN VINST 1160-5C

Requesting Reenlistment in the Navy
1..      Per reference (a), enclosure (1) is forwarded recommending
          Disapproval riot recommended for retention due o is substandard military and personal conduct, inappropriate use of a government computer, and bringing discredit to himself and the Navy as evidenced from his Special Courts—Martial. performance does not support reenhistujerit.. I have had the opportunity to directly observe his professional, military, and personal performance during the past two years. As a submarine Local Area Network Administrator, he was fully aware of the regulations regarding use of government computers. respect ~b domestic violence, despite an inordinate amount of counseling and intervention provided by this command and Fleet and Family Services, he continued to verbally and physically abuse his family. I do not have confidence in his judgment to be an effective leader and manager of government resources. Additionally, he requires direct supervision from senior enlisted and officer personnel within this command to appropriately manage personal domestic
 matters to include providing timely financial support to his
 dependents.
3. There have been no additional incidents of willful racism, sexism, sobriety issues,. or acting to deny equal opportunity as directed to comment on per reference (a).
          -- -•--. .. •   






2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03

    Original file (05848-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 09599-03

    Original file (09599-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. The Regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy, require that the naval record of subject to be corrected, where appropriate, in accordance with the approved recommendation of the Board as contained in enclosure (1). Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07308-05

    Original file (07308-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, dated 26 October 2005, a copy of which is attached, and your rebuttal to the opinion.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09059-06

    Original file (09059-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, dated 30 April 2007, a copy of that which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02967-07

    Original file (02967-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.W. The member requests the full 48 months SRB based on the OTT reenlistment authorization. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08976-02

    Original file (08976-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In petitioner's request. response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the ‘B" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner reenlisted on 05 May 2002 for six years and 2. received a zone petitioner's EAOS at the time was 04 August 2002. reenlisted prior to transfer to NAVSUPPACT SOUDA BAY GR UIC Reference Location Selective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07995-06

    Original file (07995-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 22 November 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02553-08

    Original file (02553-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501243

    Original file (ND0501243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore advised that failure to show significant progress towards meeting Navy’s body fat standards, failure to achieve body fat standards during the 12-month aftercare period, or failure to maintain standards thereafter shall result in consideration for separation from the naval service.931108: Administrative remarks from Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, GA to EN2 C_ (Applicant). SNM is able to do PRT without any problems. Additionally, i n the Applicant’s case the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08715-07

    Original file (08715-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records...