Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07041-00
Original file (07041-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 704 l-00
27 September 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

25 September 2001  

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on  
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
12/06437 of 23 August
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 SER  
2001, a copy of which is attached.

. Your allegations of error and

N3 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE 

NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1133
Ser 
23 

N312,06437

Aug 0 1

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Commander,
Executive Director

Navy  Recruiting Comman

d

, Board  for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR REQUEST ICO

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  

1130.8F

.-

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 07137-00
(2) CNRC 

ltr  1133 Ser 

334/N01060  of 28 Jul 00

except for  

NAVETs  guaranteed AECF,  

paygrade  for accession via the PRISE III program is

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
the maximum 
E-3,
is E-4.
an E-3 for Advanced Electronics and Computer Field with a six
year enlistment obligation.
to E-4 upon completion of Class  

CTI(N),  or Nuclear Field
applicant was authorized to enlist as

Applicant was authorized advancement

Per enclosure  

Per reference (a),

"A"  school.

(2),

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

2.
Correction of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08344-00

    Original file (08344-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08323-01

    Original file (08323-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. N32/6110 of 20 November opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08369-00

    Original file (08369-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05988-00

    Original file (05988-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Army OSVETS who do not have skills or training determined to be directly convertible to an enclosure (2) rating contained...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05478-01

    Original file (05478-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 05478-01 except for paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is Recommend disapproval of enclosure 1. the maximum E-3, Field(NF).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05159-00

    Original file (05159-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04999-01

    Original file (04999-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum which is attached. #an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01

    Original file (07437-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03002-01

    Original file (03002-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 03002-01 10 Jul 01 00 Per references (a) Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05906-00

    Original file (05906-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...