Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07034-00
Original file (07034-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

Docket No: 7034-00
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the  

Ifnited States Code, section  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 October 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 PERS-9 of 2 October 2001, a copy of which is
attached.

Your allegations of error and injustice

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantiali-y concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory  opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

N AVY 

PERSONNEL  COMMAN

5720 INTEGRITY DRIV

MILLINGTON TN 38055-000

E

D

0

5420
PERS-9
2 OCT 

01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-OOZCB)

:
Slibi 
----  
- 

J

RESPONSE TO 

REOUEST  FOR COMMENTS IC

,.,-,,

Ref: (a)

PERS-OOZCB  LTR of   15 AUG 
PERS-92 LTR of 14 
Dee 00
Attached BCNR Files

01

(b)
(c)

Per reference (a) the following information and

1.
comments are provided as background information for use in
formulating a decision:

is requesting an official change to
an ending date of involuntary PRC
As stated in reference (b) the  

DD-

orders to 25 Mar 1998.
214 is appropriately completed and accurately reflects
periods of voluntary and involuntary recall.
as shown in reference (c),
section of the DD-214,
accurately indicate that the member was voluntarily
extended on active duty beyond 1 Mar 1998 in order to use

The remarks

Furthermore,

ave.
which acknowledged his agreement with the
f the document.

This document is accurate as

the DD-214 was signed by CDR

written;

there is no legal reason, to change it.

b.

By law (USC 12304) reservists cannot be

involuntarily retained beyond 270 days in support of a
For this reason members were
contingency operation.
provided their choice of either selling accrued leave
(normal 60 day career limit was waived) or voluntarily
extending for the purpose of taking
as stated in reference (b).
voluntarily retained on  
period for leave purposes.

acti

pre-separation leave

hose to be
270-day recall

c .

wishes to have his DD-214 changed in

order to exempt him from a debt which resulted from

Subj:

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ICO

overpayment of the Ready Reserve Mobilization Income
Insurance Program (RRMIIP).
$5,000  a month for his
However,
as designed.
paid for 25 days while in
purposes for a total of  

The RRMIIP paid CDR
in an involuntary 

$4,166.67.

a voluntary status for leave

reca

was also incorrectly

d.

LCDR

has 

rechecke

indicate he did indeed contact CDR
1999 to inform him of the RRMIIP overpayment.

ords which
n in April of

2 .

Recommendations:

a.

It should be left as is
in the official record as executed and dated 1998 March 25.

Do not alter the DD-214.

b.
obliga

should not be relieved of the payback
rpayment.

My POC for this matter is LCDR

3.
874-4520  or DSN:   882-4520.

at Comm:

(901)

S. Naval Reserve

Reserve

Personnel Management



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03301-01

    Original file (03301-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S HD: hd Docket No: 03301-01 15 February 2002 Dear Command This is in reference to your application dated 20 April 2001 for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552, seeking removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 97 and 98 Lieutenant Commander Staff Selection Boards, and reinstatement to active duty as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072510C070403

    Original file (2002072510C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He goes on to state that he received his RRMIIP entitlements ($5,000 per month) until he was released from active duty on 19 April 1998 because he had been informed that he was eligible to continue receiving RRMIIP benefits. It states, in pertinent part, that an insured member ordered involuntarily into covered service is entitled to payment of a benefit for each month after a 30-day period of covered service, except that no member may be paid a benefit for more than 12 months during any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068547C070402

    Original file (2002068547C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that in his previous request to the Board where he requested that his indebtedness for overpayment of RRMIIP benefits be cancelled/remitted, the Board granted his request and directed that his orders be amended to show that he remained on active duty involuntarily. The active duty order must specify that the member’s service is involuntary. The Board also notes that officials at the DFAS also recognized that the intent of the Board was to cancel/remit the debt...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058025C070420

    Original file (2001058025C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states that he continued to receive his RRMIIP benefits and it was not until a year later that he received a notice from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) notifying him that he had been overpaid RRMIIP benefits because his status had been changed from involuntary to voluntary, in order to receive medical treatment. The active duty order must specify that the member’s service is involuntary. In this particular case, the Board finds no evidence to show that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08045-00

    Original file (08045-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 undated, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05388-02

    Original file (05388-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Inactive) status when you were Sl (Standby-Reserve Active) status on 6 August 1996, as you had expressed no The Board found it would not have been appropriate for cognizant naval authorities to bring up the possibility of transferring you to S2 (Standby Reserve transferred to interest in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01

    Original file (02243-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03211-01

    Original file (03211-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, is attached your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory your a copy of which After...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-00

    Original file (08299-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested correction of your record to show your voluntary resignation from the Naval Reserve on 30 June 1991, rather than involuntary discharge on 31 December 1994 by reason of two failures of selection to lieutenant commander. his in All members of the Ready Reserve, including IRR members, are 4. required by law to be considered by promotion selection boards, whether or not they are actively participating. It was during this time that he stopped active participation with his unit,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01679-01

    Original file (01679-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. The Board was likewise unable to find that the Commander, Naval Surface Reserve Force denied your right to an interview with him; that he inadequately reviewed the DFC documentation; or that he wrongfully concurred with and forwarded the DFC recommendation. Since the Board found that the DFC and related fitness report should stand, they had no...