Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072510C070403
Original file (2002072510C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 27 August 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002072510


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deyon D. Battle Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Thomas Lanyi Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, the remission/cancellation of his debt to the government, which resulted from an overpayment of Ready Reserve Mobilization Income Insurance Program (RRMIIP) benefits.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was mobilized on 12 February 1997 for a period of 270 days in support of Operation Joint Guard. He states that during the time that he was mobilized he was injured, which resulted in his having to undergo an operation. He states that after the operation he was in rehabilitation, which prolonged his tour on active duty until he was released from his doctor’s care. He goes on to state that he received his RRMIIP entitlements ($5,000 per month) until he was released from active duty on 19 April 1998 because he had been informed that he was eligible to continue receiving RRMIIP benefits. He states that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) notified him that he has been overpaid and they are now collecting the debt that was incurred as a result of his being misinformed.

4. The applicant’s military records show that while serving in the pay grade of E-5 in the United States Army Reserve (USAR), the applicant enrolled in the RRMIIP effective 1 October 1996 at the $5,000.00 rate.

5. On 8 January 1997, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Joint Endeavor/Guard effective 12 February 1997, for a period of 109 days. Orders were published on 8 April 1997, amending the 8 January 1997, orders to change his number of days on active duty to 270 days.

6. On 19 September 1997, while he was in Kaiserslautern, Germany the applicant was working under a vehicle in the motor pool when his right hand slipped hitting against the vehicle. On 19 November 1997, he underwent surgery, which involved repairing a ligament in his right wrist. He was placed in a cast for 12 weeks and he required rehabilitation for 2 months.

7. On 19 April 1998, he was honorably released from active duty and was transferred to Headquarters, Headquarters Company, 7th Army Command. He had served 1 year, 2 months and 8 days of total active service.

8. The DFAS sent the applicant a notice of indebtedness on 21 June 1999 informing him that Title 10, United States Code 12304 limits involuntary service to a maximum of 270 days for any presidential call up and that RRMIIP benefits are only payable for involuntary service. The DFAS informed him that his service modified his benefit termination date and as a result he had been overpaid. He was informed that he would be contacted at a later date with additional details and to make arrangements for repayment.



9. In the processing of this case a staff member of the Board contacted officials at the DFAS to ascertain the amount of the applicant’s indebtedness. Officials at the DFAS indicated that the amount of the debt was $20,833.34 and that they have recouped $1,336.33 via garnishment of his pay. The staff member was also able to obtain an RRMIIP Debt Worksheet, which reflects that the applicant did not receive his first RRMIIP payment until 1 July 1997 in the amount of $5,000.00. The worksheet shows that his demobilization date was retroactively changed from 19 April 1998 to 8 November 1997 per an Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCM) fax dated 15 October 1998, to comply with an Office of the Secretary of Defense’s Directive that no one can be called to active duty involuntarily longer than 270 days, pursuant to a Presidential Selected Reserve Call-up. Based on the RRMIIP Debt Worksheet the total benefits paid to the applicant was $60,000.00 ($5,000.00 a month for 12 months) and the payments were made between 1 July 1997 and 15 July 1998.

10. Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1341.10 implemented the RRMIIP procedures. It states, in pertinent part, that an insured member ordered involuntarily into covered service is entitled to payment of a benefit for each month after a 30-day period of covered service, except that no member may be paid a benefit for more than 12 months during any period of 18 consecutive months. The active duty order must specify that the member’s service is involuntary.

11. On 14 October 1997, the RRMIIP statute authorizing reservists to receive RRMIIP benefit payments for a maximum of 12 months was addressed by the Associate Deputy General Counsel (Compensation Matters), Office Deputy General Counsel (Fiscal), DOD. He opined of a service member’s eligibility for RRMIIP benefits while in a medical hold status. He opined that an insured member performing covered service under an order to active duty for 270 days, who is placed in a medical hold status would remain entitled to payment beyond the 270 days if the original orders were amended to extend the period of service beyond 270 days so that the member could complete a course of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board has noted that the RRMIIP was plagued with problems throughout the Department from the onset. It appears that the primary difficulty experienced was the dissemination and understanding of the program to the soldiers as well as the lack of understanding of the specifics of the program by the personnel responsible for briefing and administering the program. Consequently, the Board has seen many appeals that involved either a failure on the part of the Department to afford soldiers the opportunity to participate in the program or a failure to properly brief on the specifics/entitlements of the program.

2. The Board also notes that the purpose of the RRMIIP was to provide income insurance for most Reserve Component members involuntarily ordered to active duty in support of military operations for more than 30 days and the intent of the RRMIIP was to alleviate the financial hardships that a Reservist typically experiences during such deployments.

3. In this particular case, the Board finds no evidence to show that the Department properly advised the applicant that by consenting to remain on active duty to receive medical treatment, his entitlement to RRMIIP benefits would be terminated. In fact, his benefits continued to be paid. This action, in itself, is indicative that the applicant was not properly advised at the time.

4. It is inequitable for the military to give the applicant the impression that he was entitled to RRMIIP benefits, while simultaneously and without his knowledge, terminating his RRMIIP eligibility while continuing to pay him. A demand for recoupment under these circumstances is unfair; especially since the applicant was seriously injured during a deployment and was dependent solely on military health care. This was an involuntary extension on active duty.

5. Pursuant to the guidance by the Office of General Counsel, Secretary of Defense, it is appropriate to amend the applicant’s orders and records to reflect that his entire period on active duty was pursuant to the Presidential call-up, involuntary, and covered service in support of an operational mission.

6. Accordingly, the Board finds that the $20,833.34 debt was and is invalid from its inception as a matter of law, equitable, and justice.

7. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected, as an exception to policy:

a. by amending his orders to reflect that he was involuntarily ordered to active duty and subsequently involuntarily extended on active duty pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 12304;

b. by invalidating the debt and all administrative changes related thereto from the date of inception;

c. by returning to the applicant all funds recouped or collected from him; and

d. by notifying all appropriate credit agencies and financial institutions that the debt was erroneously incurred and that the debt has never been and is not valid.

BOARD VOTE:

__ao____ __inw ___ __tl ____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Irene N. Wheelwright___
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002072510
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/08/27
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 293 128.1000
2. 13 101.0000
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058025C070420

    Original file (2001058025C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states that he continued to receive his RRMIIP benefits and it was not until a year later that he received a notice from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) notifying him that he had been overpaid RRMIIP benefits because his status had been changed from involuntary to voluntary, in order to receive medical treatment. The active duty order must specify that the member’s service is involuntary. In this particular case, the Board finds no evidence to show that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057966C070420

    Original file (2001057966C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that On 21 October 1996, while serving as a USAR soldier in the pay grade of E-6, the applicant completed a DD Form 2746 (Ready Reserve Mobilization Insurance Certificate) in which he elected coverage in the amount of $1,500.00 and initialed after the amount selected in block 7a of that form. In subsequent correspondence to the applicant’s congressional representative, the DFAS explained that the second election form increasing his coverage should not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068547C070402

    Original file (2002068547C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that in his previous request to the Board where he requested that his indebtedness for overpayment of RRMIIP benefits be cancelled/remitted, the Board granted his request and directed that his orders be amended to show that he remained on active duty involuntarily. The active duty order must specify that the member’s service is involuntary. The Board also notes that officials at the DFAS also recognized that the intent of the Board was to cancel/remit the debt...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080256C070215

    Original file (2002080256C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an application to this Board dated 22 February 2002, the applicant requested retroactive enrollment in and compensation from the RRMIIP. The initial enrollment period for active members of the Reserve Components (USAR and National Guard) was 1 October 1996 through 31 December 1996. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll the applicant in the RRMIIP effective 8 December 1996 (the day the unit was briefed), when a proper briefing should have been conducted and prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080512C070215

    Original file (2002080512C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application he submits his RRMIIP enrollment packet dated 12 July 1997; a copy of his RRMIIP appeal packet; a copy of orders dated 24 August 1997, ordering him to active duty effective 19 August 1997; a copy of orders dated 9 April 1998, releasing him from active duty effect 18 April 1998; a copy of a memorandum dated 31 July 1998 from the former commander of the 805 th MP Company attesting to the fact that the applicant was not properly briefed regarding the RRMIIP until...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088415C070403

    Original file (2003088415C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that, in cases similar to his, this Board, based on the unit commander stating that there was no official briefing given until 12 July 1997, has approved the cases. In support of his application, he submits a copy of a memorandum from the RRMIIP Program Manager dated 16 June 1998; a copy of his RRMIIP enrollment packet dated 12 July 1997; a copy of the orders dated 24 August 1997 ordering him to active duty with a reporting date of 19 August 1997; an undated memorandum addressed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066429C070402

    Original file (2002066429C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further opined that the applicant had not been briefed or properly afforded the opportunity to enroll in the RRMIIP. Personnel who enlisted in a TPU after the initial enrollment period were required to be briefed on the program within 60 days of arrival in the unit and had 60 days after being briefed to enroll or decline. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll the applicant in the RRMIIP effective 8 December 1996 (the day the unit conducted its only briefing),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081287C070215

    Original file (2002081287C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The supporting memorandum from the applicant’s unit commander is dated 11 December 1997 and confirms that the applicant was not present at the RRMIIP briefing in December 1996. Given the commander’s certification that the applicant was not briefed on 8 December 1996 when the unit was briefed on the RRMIIP, the Board is convinced that the applicant was not properly briefed on the RRMIIP. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll the applicant in the RRMIIP effective 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082935C070215

    Original file (2002082935C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 September 2002, the applicant submitted an application to this Board requesting that his records be corrected to show an application for enrollment in the RRMIIP at the $5,000.00 per month option. He states that in December 1996, members of the 111 th ASG received a briefing on the provisions and benefits of the RRMIIP; however, at no time did he receive a briefing nor was he aware of a briefing regarding the RRMIIP until the unit was mobilized. Accordingly, it would be in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071907C070403

    Original file (2002071907C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, he submits orders dated 9 July 1997, ordering him to active duty effective 18 July 1997; a copy of a sworn statement dated 31 October 1997, stating that he missed the RRMIIP briefing because the unit had a Christmas party on 8 December 1996, the same day as the briefing; a copy of a letter from his wife’s employer dated 27 October 1997, stating, in effect, that she was at work on 8 December 1996, from 7:00 am to 12:00 pm; a copy of a memorandum dated 9 February...