DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 6420-01
30 October 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 19 September 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 29 August to 22
September 2000, when you were discharged for failing to meet medical procurement
standards due to Osgood-Schlatter ’s disease, which was aggravated by running and marching.
You were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4, as required by governing directives. The
fact that your condition is no longer symptomatic, and your desire to reenlist in the Navy,
were considered insufficient to warrant changing the basis for your discharge or assigning
you a more favorable reenlistment code.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
Board. In this
attaches to all official
upon submission of new
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03570-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 18 October 2001, your separation was At that time, you were Since the Board found no evidence that RE-4 Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3E or reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05451-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subsequently, the separation authority directed an entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment, September 1999. reenlistment and were assigned an RR-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05331-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04328-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2001. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reehlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08437-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and and policies. The Board concluded that your discharge was proper and Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when there is a finding that an individual is at risk for self harm. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05255-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 24 September 1998 at age 21. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04441-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 12 January 2001 Subsequently, At the time The Board thus concluded that there is no error or The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04005-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. At the time you The Board noted that an RE-3P reenlistment code is the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to a physical condition existing prior to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03994-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06264-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...