DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
19 September 2002
3570-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application,
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
together with all material submitted in
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On 20 September 2001, you were
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 January 2001
for four years at age 18.
referred for a psychological consultation due to episodes of
sleepwalking.
and were recommended for administrative separation.
failed to disclose this condition prior to enlistment, you would
not have been enlisted had you revealed this problem, and
clearly the disorder was too severe for you to adapt to the
naval environment.
You were diagnosed with somnambulism since age 3
Because you
On 15 October 2001 you were notified that separation action was
being initiated by reason of erroneous entry as evidenced by
pre-service episodes of somnambulism since age 3.
You were
advised of and waived all of your procedural rights, with the
exception of obtaining copies of documents that supported the
basis for separation.
approved and on 5 November 2001 you received an honorable
discharge by reason of erroneous entry.
assigned an RE-3E reenlistment code.
On 18 October 2001, your separation was
At that time, you were
Since the Board found no evidence that
RE-4
Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3E or
reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason of
erroneous enlistment.
the diagnosis of somnambulism was incorrect, and given the
apparent severity of this diagnosis, the Board concluded that
the RE-3E reenlistment code was proper and no change is
Further, your assigned separation code was
warranted.
appropriately assigned as evidenced by the fact that you
withheld medical information that, if known, would have
disqualified you for enlistment.
code is the most favorable code that may be assigned to an
individual separated due to erroneous enlistment.
your application has been denied.
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the
Finally, an RE-3E reenlistment
Accordingly,
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02956-01
Sleepwalking is such a condition. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by chang- assigned on 8 January 1997, to ing the RE-4 reenlistment code, RE-3E. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00848-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2002. On 10 October 1991 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment, as evidenced by the diagnosis of enuresis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06951-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his reenlistment code be changed. The petty officer filled out some paperwork for him to see a psychiatrist and told him to tell the psychiatrist that he was depressed and suicidal, and had attempted suicide at an early age. MAJORITY RECOMMENDATION: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03498-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were referred to the On 15 July 1999 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the personality disorder....
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00024
I submit to this Board, if there are no service member related negative conditions and that this discharge was enacted for the "convenience of the government" for a pre-existing medical condition, to respectfully consider the upgrading of this discharge to "honorable".” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03200-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2003. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08201-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show an RE-3 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. However, the doctor at recruit training recommended his separation because a waiver of his physical condition was required prior to enlistment. The Board further concludes that this Report...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05022-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. antisocial personality...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00214
ND02-00214 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020108, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reenlistment code changed to anything other than an RE-5. I felt that the individual who "claimed" to have seen this event was doing so in collaboration with another to either have me removed from duty or they were highly mistaken. (Applicant) Documentation Only the service and medical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03933-01
Since recruit training was the first time he was away from home and has not suffered from depression since, the specialty advisor opines that Petitioner is an appropriate candidate for the NROTC program_ Q- Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3E or an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 9 December 1999, to RE-3E. That any material or entries...