Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06554-00
Original file (06554-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRE
Docket No: 6554-00
2 1 September 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 September 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found that you underwent a pre-separation physical examination on 24 February
1988, and were found fit for separation.
You were discharged from the Navy under
time, with the exception of slight headaches.
other than honorable conditions on 2 March 1988, pursuant to your request for discharge in
lieu of trial by court-martial for multiple violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

You indicated that you were  in good health at that

In addition, it noted that as you were separated because of your own

The Board noted that there is no indication in the available records that you were unfit to
perform your duties because of a disability which was incurred in or aggravated by your
naval service.
misconduct, you would not have been entitled to disability evaluation processing even if you
had been questionably unfit for duty. The Board was not persuaded that your discharge
under other than honorable conditions was unjust.
service was properly characterized, given the serious nature of your misconduct, which
included threatening and being disrespectful to a medical officer, disrespect to and
disobedience of the orders of masters at arms, and failing to report for urinalysis testing and

In this regard, it concluded that your

a sweeping detail.

In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01420-01

    Original file (01420-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2001. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 October 1988. separation physical examination on 3 June 1992. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5790 13

    Original file (NR5790 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The available records do not demonstrate that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on the date of your discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05250-00

    Original file (05250-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 1971 your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02414-08

    Original file (02414-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05285-01

    Original file (05285-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. The available records do not establish that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder at the time of your release from active duty or for several years thereafter, or that you were unfit for duty when separated from the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07323-10

    Original file (07323-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03060-03

    Original file (03060-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 5 June 1981. In the absence of evidence that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07156-06

    Original file (07156-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 March 1989. It noted that you would not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07721-09

    Original file (07721-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You had no military status during the period from 26 June 1979 to 19 December 1988. , The Board considered your application and all pertinent records in accordance with the provisions of SECNAV Instruction 5420.193, enclosure (1), Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (codified at 32 CFR 723), paragraph 3e. During the 1979-1989 period, you received treatment from VA health care providers for multiple conditions such as hip, back and knee pain, chronic recurrent foot pain,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01379-01

    Original file (01379-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB essentially found that given the nature Discharge Review Board of your offenses and your excellent post service conduct, a discharge under other than honorable conditions was no longer appropriate. such as your youth and desire for However, the Board Concerning your request for a change in the reenlistment code, the Board noted that regulations require the assignment of an 4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for...