DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No:
27 November 2001
5 183-01
This is in reference to
provisions of title
your application
fi,r correction of your naval record pursuant to the
10 of the
IJniled
Stat&
Code, section
1552.
reviewctl in
A three-member panel of the
session, considered
injustice were
Board.
to the proceedings
your application,
together with
applicable statutes, regulations
opinion
attached.
f~irnished by
of this
CM(1
Hoard
for
(hrrection of Naval Records, sitting in executive
your application on 27 November 2001. Your allegations of error and
accortlance
n*i(ll administrative regulations
and procedures applicable
Documntary material considered by the Board consisted of
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
and policies.
Iiiemorand~IIn
II addition, the Board considered the advisory
I
1400
MMI’R 2 of I
1 October 200
1, a copy of which
is
After careful and conscientious consideration of
evidence submitted was
injustice. In this connection,
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,
the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
the entire record, the Board found that th e
insut’l‘icient to establish the existence of probable material error or
the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
your application has been denied. The names and votes of
circumslances of
It is regretted that the
You are entitled to have the
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when
demonstrate
your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
~7 for a correction of ‘ an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
Board reconsider its decision
nnterial error or injustice.
applyin,
the existence
prcM~le
of
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
CORh
HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221344104
IN REPLY REFER TO:
0
140
MMPR-2
11
Ott 01
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
OF
Staff Sergeant
1.
non-selection to gunnery sergeant and remedial consideration for
promotion.
- requested a reason concerning his
A review of Staff
ecord shows he was
sergeant by the Calendar
Many high quality Marines are not selected because
2.
Serge&n<
considered and non-selected for
Year 1994 through Calendar Year 1997 Gunnery Sergeant Selection
Boards.
competition is very keen for promotion to the limited number of
promotions available.
The confidentiality of the selection
board process precludes anyone from knowing the exact reasons
why any Marine was not selected.
a specific reason other than the keen competition.
be inferred that,
members, his record was not competitive with the records of the
Marines selected for promotion.
based upon a majority vote of the board
Sometimes there really is not
It can only
3.
Staff Sergeant
selection in 1997.
be approved.
submitted a request for remedial
HIS request was denied
.on 24 December 1997
tter was sent to his command informing Staff Sergeant
of the decision.
While on active duty there was no
cant change to his record to allow a remedial request to
4.
Point of contact is Maj
t (703) 784-9710.
Marine Corps
Head, Enlisted Promotion Section
By direction of
The Commandant of the
Marine.Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03723-01
has requested to have his date of rank selected by the CY 1997 Gunnery considered in zone for contends that the reason he was Gunnery Sergeant wh as considered and not selected for 8 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Boards. Gunnery Sergeant promotion by CY 1997 The specific reason(s) why he was not selected by either of these two Many high quality Marines are not selected boards is not known. upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06715-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the Marines selected for promotion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01685-06
In the alternative, you now request new enlisted remedial selection boards (ERSB’s) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999, 2000 and 2001 master sergeant and first sergeant selection boards.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. The Board found the ~Th’IPR-2 advisory opinion dated 2 August 2006 was correct as to the number of Marines with whom you were compared, despite the indications, in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01350-02
Consequently, he was never given the His detaching fitness report was below d. If a response to the adverse fitness report had been on file when the promotion board first reviewed his records for consideration for promotion to gunnery sergeant in CY 2000 his comments and the fitness report would have been reviewed at the same time, enclosure (2). g- The CY 2001 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board convened on 24 April 2001, prior to the date that the Performance Evaluation Review Board reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00229-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-99
authoriz s been 344 days of became eligible for promotion to Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR) promotion board however, was not selected due to keen 1993 selection message. selected for promotion by any of the boards who considered his record. Head, Reserve Affairs Personnel Management Branch Reserve Affairs Division By direction r DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT HARRY LEE HALL, QUANTICO, VIRGINIA I7 LEJEUNE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00588-06
Applicant’s adverse fitness was entered into his official record while his record was before the calendar year Se1ectjon Board. On 28 May 2004, almost 4 years after his first non— selection, Applicant submitted a package to the Board for Correction Of Naval Records. Moreover, reference (b) requires due diligence to seek corrective action and remedial promotion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07166-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removal of the contested fitness report for 1 January to 2 February 1996. The Board also considered your rebuttal letter dated 30 July 2002 with enclosures.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.In concluding that no further correction to your fitness report record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07469-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 29 November 2000 and 2 January 2001, copies of which are attached. 2 Subj: ~ GUNNERY SERGEANT U~IIIIhIUBCR f. Gunnery Sergean rovides a statement in support of his request for removal of’ ‘the page 11 entry. g. Gunnery Sergean rovides documentation, a copy of a personal award, the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal he received to support his request for removal of the page 11 entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08696-00
1552 (1) (2) (3) (4) DD Form 149 w/attachments E-mail from CMC memo Petitioner's Microfiche MSgt Hull, Career Counselor 1400/3, MMPR-2, 12 Feb 01 filed enclosure (1) with that the applicable naval paygrade E-8 for the CY96 Active Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), subject, 1. hereinafter, referred to as Petitioner, this Board requesting, in effect, record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to remedial promotion consideration to Reserve (AR) Staff Noncommissioned Officer...