DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX
NAVY
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Naval Records
S
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 5057-01
10 October 2001
Ref:
(a) Title 10 U.S.C.
1552
Encl :
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memorandum 1 160 PERS 8 1
(3) Subject’s naval record
1 of 17 September 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
(1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
1.
filed enclosure
corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the Selective Training and
Reenlistment (STAR) program.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Morgan, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner
10 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
allegations of error and
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
iIi.iustice on
’s
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
b.
subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has nieri
t and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of
contents of enclosure
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
following corrective action.
the
Docket No: 5057-01
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a. The reenlistment executed on or about 27 April 2001 was under the provisions of
the STAR program.
b. He was automatically advanced to
paygrade
E5 effective 27 April 2001.
C.
That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
G&A
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder
cm&L_
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
10 October 200
1
Executive Dir
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02706-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 2706-01 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that the enlistment of 10 October 2000 is in paygrade E2. Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06053-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02256-01
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 8 11 of 18 October 2001 (3) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record corrected to show he reenlisted and was automatically advanced under the provisions of Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03056-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03285-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00868-01
Pursuant to the provisions filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bartlett, Ms. Humberd, and Ms. Newman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02498-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 2498-01 17 July 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show automatic advancement under the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03308-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07991-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08316-01
Pursuant to the pravisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was automatically advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,...