DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 6053-01
8 January 2002
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Ref:
Encl:
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 8 11 of 18 October 2001
(3) Subject ’s naval record
1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective
Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr.
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Mimer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
b.
subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
(2), the Board finds the existence of an
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
and especially in light of the
injustice warranting the
Docket No: 6053-01
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a. The reenlistment executed on or about 7 August 2000 was under the provisions of
the STAR program.
b. He was automatically advanced to
paygrade E5 effective 7 August 2000.
C. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
ik
Gd?
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
8 January 2002
Executive Direct
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02256-01
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 8 11 of 18 October 2001 (3) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record corrected to show he reenlisted and was automatically advanced under the provisions of Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07991-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03308-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03924-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:yrj Docket No: 3924-02 16 July 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ‘- - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05554-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 5554-02 17 September 2002 From: To: Subj: 1 Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ___. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08316-01
Pursuant to the pravisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was automatically advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03056-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01506-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show automatic advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08049-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH :ddj Docket No: 8049-02 17 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00874-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Cooper, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...