Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03285-01
Original file (03285-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

MEH: ddj
Docket No:  
24 July 2001

3285-01

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Ref:

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) BUPERS memorandum 1160 1160 NPC 815 of 26 June 2001
(3) Subject ’s naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective
Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

In correspondence attached as enclosure  

(2), the office having cognizance over the

subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure  
following corrective action.

(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

Docket No: 3285-01

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a. The reenlistment executed on or about 25 September 1998 is

the STAR program

under the provisions of

b. He was automatically advanced to  

paygrade E-5 effective 25 September 1998.

C. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

GLkkC
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures

5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

24 July 2001



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03056-01

    Original file (03056-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03308-01

    Original file (03308-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02498-01

    Original file (02498-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 2498-01 17 July 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show automatic advancement under the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02072-01

    Original file (02072-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the AME rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00868-01

    Original file (00868-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bartlett, Ms. Humberd, and Ms. Newman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03285-11

    Original file (03285-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC ‘Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 August 2011...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03717-01

    Original file (03717-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone HM rating (NEC 8485). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The 2...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07991-01

    Original file (07991-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08316-01

    Original file (08316-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the pravisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was automatically advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01506-01

    Original file (01506-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show automatic advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...