DEPARTMENTAqF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No: 4830-01
13 July 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 28 June 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty from 7 to 30 June 1999, when you were
discharged because of enuresis, a disqualifying condition which you concealed when you
applied for enlistment. You were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4 to reflect that you
were not eligible or recommended for reenlistment.
condition, and the fraudulent circumstances of your enlistment, the Board did not believe that
you were a suitable candidate for further service, and it was unable to recommend any
corrective action in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
In view of your the nature of your
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
In this
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
ofticial naval record, the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00647-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Since you were treated no differently than others discharged under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04780-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 August 2001. The Board noted that the issue of treatment and compensation for the recurrence and/or deterioration of your condition which occurred following your release from active duty is a matter withing the purview of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), rather than the Department of the Navy, absent evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04005-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. At the time you The Board noted that an RE-3P reenlistment code is the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to a physical condition existing prior to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01980-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03203-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2001. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for further service by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge, and that your discharge by reason of misconduct was erroneous or unjust, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01948-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 July 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulation, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07219-01
.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03967-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. performance evaluation for the period 29 June to 15 September 2000, you were not recommended for promotion or retention in the You received the general discharge on 15 September 2000. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03990-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found no evidence that the diagnosis of adjustment disorder was incorrect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04097-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The psychologist believed that this condition would Thirteen Based on this recommendation, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.