Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04382-01
Original file (04382-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 4382-01
25 September 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

25 September 2001. Your allegations of error and

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on  
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 Ser
which is attached.

l/043 of 30 August 2001, a copy of

 

45 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application has   been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

NAVY 

5720 

PERSONNEL COMMAN
Ih-5GRITY  DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN  

38055-0000

Y

D

5420
Ser 
30 Aug 01

451/ 043

Distribution Management, Allocation, Resources

Director,
and Procedures Division (PERS-45)
Executive Director,
Assistant for Board for Correction of Naval Records
Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Board for Correction of Naval Records

BOA
ICO

(a) PERS-OOZCB memo  

5420 dtd 13   Aug 01

-_-

PLICATION

(1) BCNR Application with microfiche Service

Record

(2) NAVADMIN 

163/99

From:

To:
Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Per reference (a),

1.
following comments:

enclosure (1) is returned with the

a.

CORRECTION ISSUE FROM MEMBER:

Requesting correction to

be automatically advanced to E4 upon successful completion of
school under the GENDET Targeted Enlistment Program (GTEP).

(TASP)  effective 1 June

b.

COMMENTS:

NAVADMIN 

163/99  announced GTEP, which

(2)).

"A" School Program  
Although similar programs, GTEP differ

replaced the Targeted
1999 (enclosure  
from TASP as it provides an enlistment bonus, while TASP
provided automatic advancement to E4 following school
completion.
to the member's package is outdated and was an initial rewrite
of the article following   GTEP implementation which included
previous TASP information..
2000 to ensure previous TASP provisions were deleted and article
followed NAVADMIN  

The Enlisted Transfer Manual Article

The article was updated in October

163/99.

 

s

7.081 attached

C .

CONCLUSION:

Automatic advancement to E4 following

completion of school is not a provision under GTEP, nor was it
guaranteed in member's contract.
disapproval of SN

Accordingly, recommend

.petition  request.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04197-01

    Original file (04197-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. THE $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF A GTEP 2. WITH COMMAND INVOLVEMENT VIA GTEP RECRUITS SHOULD RETURN TO WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04544-01

    Original file (04544-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID THE GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF 2. WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE CASE, EVERY...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06317-01

    Original file (06317-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05213-01

    Original file (05213-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 5213-01 25 September 2001 __- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06838-01

    Original file (06838-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 25 September 2001 6838-01 ._- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00566-03

    Original file (00566-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant must meet the applicable education requirements for at c. least one of the ratings offered in the field in which they are enlisting. GTEP applicants are guaranteed assignment to an "A" school for a rating within the field they enlisted. 31-4 GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program g. The GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program provides individuals enlisting in either the two, three or four-year obligor GENDET program guaranteed assignment to one of six homeports upon successful completion of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04213-01

    Original file (04213-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 4213-01 25 September 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser 33416413 of is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05208-01

    Original file (05208-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Per under GTEP, nor was it guaranteed in your enlistment contract. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01

    Original file (03457-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04573-01

    Original file (04573-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an...