Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04034-01
Original file (04034-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 4034-01
31 July 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section  1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 3 1 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER  
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

334/06405  of 6 July 2001, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE 
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

NAVY

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057

IN REPLY REFER 

To:

1133
Ser 
6 

Jul 0 1

334,66405

From:
To:

Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records

-%

Suoj:

BCNR REQUEST ICO

Ref:

(a) COMNAVCRUITCCMINST  
(b) BUPERS 
ltr 1130 Ser 

1130.8F
N132C4/22

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 04034-01

L

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

Per references (a)
1.
and (b), OSVETS who do not have skills or training determined to
be directly convertible to an approved rating will be enlisted at
their discharge  
paygrade of E-3 (unless
DD 214 states applicant
eligible for advanced  
was discharged at  

paygrade up to a maximum 
paygrade E-2/E-3).

paygrade E-2.

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

2.
Cc'rrection of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03469-01

    Original file (03469-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER In addition, the Board considered the advisory of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03718-01

    Original file (03718-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01092-01

    Original file (01092-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01689-01

    Original file (01689-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02406-01

    Original file (02406-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03731-01

    Original file (03731-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. 1966/3 contained in enclosure Per reference (a), (b), Army OSVETs who do not paygrade This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01416-01

    Original file (01416-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07350-00

    Original file (07350-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05170-01

    Original file (05170-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04237-01

    Original file (04237-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. enclosure (2) and the DD Form 1966 contained in enclosure the applicant was authorized to enlist in paygrade attend members must enlist in eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed Class school.