Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11028-08
Original file (11028-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JSR
Docket No: 11028-08
21 May 2009

 

Dea 2.

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

You requested that your naval record be corrected by amending
your DD Form 214 (“Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty”) for your release from active duty in the Marine
Corps on 5 November 1994 to reflect your grade as corporal (pay
grade E-4) vice lance corporal (pay grade E-3) and to show you
were awarded the Combat Action Ribbon (for service in Somalia),
the United Nations Medal (also for service in Somalia) and the
Kuwait Liberation Medal (for service in the Persian Gulf during
Operation Cease-Fire).

It is noted that Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) has issued you
a DD Form 215 (“Correction to DD Form 214”) reflecting your
grade as corporal and showing you were awarded the United
Nations Medal and the Kuwait Liberation Medal.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 May 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinions from HQMC dated 10 December 2008 with
references (b) and (c), 22 January 2009 with enclosures, and 26
February 2009 with enclosure (DD Form 215), copies of which are
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion
dated 22 January 2009 in concluding you have not established you
were eligible for the Combat Action Ribbon. Accordingly, your
application for relief beyond that effected by HQMC has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Ne Reale JO

W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di r

Enclosures

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016951

    Original file (20080016951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct dates of his service in Southwest Asia and to show his service in Somalia. This DD Form 215 should have also corrected the applicant's records to show his service in Somalia. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000426

    Original file (20100000426.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 November 2006, the Military Awards Branch issued a DD Form 215 correcting the applicant's 2004 DD Form 214 by adding to item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges), the Combat Action Badge, Iraq Campaign Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Overseas Service Ribbon, and the Navy Unit Commendation Medal. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) provides the following; a. completion of the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) in 2000; b. completion of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06987-09

    Original file (06987-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501226

    Original file (MD0501226.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and/or from an attached document/letter to the Board:“Application for correction of military record under the provisions of title 10, U. S. code, section 1552 (5, 6) Application for the review of discharge from the Armed Forces of the Unites States (6):I, R_ E_ K_(Applicant), would like to request that my discharge determination of Other than Honorable be changed to a Medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004221

    Original file (20120004221.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the Southwest Asia Service Medal from item 13 of her DD Form 214 and adding to: * item 13 – * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal-Somalia * Southwest Asia Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Kuwait Liberation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019066

    Original file (20110019066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 9 August 2003 to show the following awards: * Iraq Campaign Medal * Armed Forces Service Medal (Bosnia) * Overseas Service Ribbon * United Nations Medal (Haiti, Somalia, or Bosnia) 2. h. The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600502

    Original file (MD0600502.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Applicant chose to make a rebuttal.010606: Applicant’s rebuttal page 11 entry.010703: NAVDRUGLAB, SAN DIEGO, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 010629, tested positive for THC.010901: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020347

    Original file (20140020347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states orders were never issued to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal or promote him to SGT/E-5. In the absence of any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of active Army service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02941-09

    Original file (02941-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your: application on 6 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02755-09

    Original file (02755-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) states the requirements for promotion to the rank of corporal were as follows: (1) Complete the minimum time in grade/time in service...