Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02451-01
Original file (02451-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TJR
Docket No: 2451-01
9 October 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 2 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

considered your

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Your record reflects that during the period

The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 June 1979
at the age of 17.
from 8 February to 24 November 1980 you received nonjudicial
punishment (NJP) on three occasions for a day of unauthorized
absence 
(UA), breaking restriction, possession of alcoholic
beverages in your room,
On 13 and
16 August 1981 you received NJP for three periods of UA totalling
four days and failure to obey a lawful order.

and possession of marijuana.

Your record further reflects that on 19 January 1982 you were
convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of disrespect and
assault.
three months, a $900 forfeiture of pay, and a bad conduct
discharge 
and on 7 April 1983 you received the BCD.

You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for

The BCD was approved at all levels of review

(BCD).

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such   as
your youth and immaturity,
and your good post service conduct.
However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to

warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the
seriousness of your repetitive misconduct, including drug abuse
and assault, which resulted in five  
conviction.
concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is
warranted.

NJPs and a court-martial
Given the circumstances of your case, the Board

Accordingly, your application has been denied.

The names and votes of the  members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04465-01

    Original file (04465-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The record does not indicate if any disciplinary action was taken for this period of UA. good post service conduct, and your However, the Board concluded these...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04397-01

    Original file (04397-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ' application on 27 November 2001. Your record reflects that on 19 May 1981 you The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 14 October 1980 at the age of 22. received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for two periods of unauthorized absence (UA) totalling 15 days and were awarded a $250 forfeiture of pay and restriction and extra duty for 30 On 16 July 1981 you received NJP for three...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00327-01

    Original file (00327-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, during the seven month period from March 1973 to October 1973 you received four nonjudicial punishments ( N J P ) and were convicted by a summary court-martial. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05727-00

    Original file (05727-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record reflects that on 30 April 1973 you The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 12 July 1972 at the age of 19. received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a two day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded a $50 forfeiture of pay, which was suspended. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04140-01

    Original file (04140-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 6 November 1980 you received NJP for absence from your appointed place of duty and were awarded a $125 forfeiture of pay and restriction and extra duty for 14 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02989-01

    Original file (02989-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04484-01

    Original file (04484-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. for immediate execution of the BCD, desire to remain in the Naval Service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01232-01

    Original file (01232-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. in support of your contention, evidence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03084-01

    Original file (03084-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. the record does not reflect what, if any, disciplinary action taken for this offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05812-00

    Original file (05812-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. recommended you be issued an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with military authorities. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...