DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
T&JR
Docket No:
19 December 2001
4484-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 December 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 25 July 1956 at the
age of 17.
Your record reflects that you served for a year and
five months without disciplinary incident but on 30 December 1957
you received nonjudicial punishment
(NJP) for absence from your
appointed place of duty and were awarded extra duty for 20 hours.
Approximately a year later,
on 16 December 1958, you received NJP
for possession of two identification (ID) cards, lending an ID
card, and wearing civilian clothing aboard your ship.
punishment imposed was restriction for two weeks.
The
You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for
Your record further reflects that on 1 May 1959 you were
convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of an 81 day period of
unauthorized absence (UA), breaking restriction, and altering an
ID card.
four months, a $280 forfeiture of pay, and a bad conduct
discharge (BCD).
for immediate execution of the BCD,
desire to remain in the Naval Service.
approved at all levels of review,
received the BCD.
On 10 July 1959 you submitted a written request
stating that you did not
Subsequently, the BCD was
and on 25 September 1959 you
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity and post service conduct.
Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness
of your repetitive misconduct,
court-martial conviction.
lengthy period of UA.
the'Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no
change is warranted.
denied.
Accordingly, your application has been
The Board especially noted your
However, the
which resulted in two
NJPs and a
Given all the circumstances of your case,
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10197-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. imposed was reduction to On 11 March and again on 5 May 1959 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of two periods of unauthorized absence (UA) totalling three days and breaking restriction. January 1961 the discharge authority then directed an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness due to frequent involvement of a discreditable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05744-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. immediate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02747-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ,Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of application on 13 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Given the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06645-01
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BO ARD FOR CORRE CT ION OF N AV AL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TJR Docket No: 6645-0 1 13 May 200 2 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. sitting in executive session, considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, application on 7 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08556-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 20 October 1960 you submitted a written request for immediate execution of the BCD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02531-01
2531-01 15 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 11 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your offenses...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03750-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were sentenced to confinement for 16 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08758-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result, on 2 September 1960, you were convicted by general court-martial (GCM) of three periods of UA totalling 184 days and sentenced to a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00035-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. th'am for money and a place to March 1962 you were convicted by special court-martial of a On 7 46 day period of UA, possession of two military ID cards, making a false official statement, were sentenced to confinement at...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02060-00
On 3 January 1959 you received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty. thereafter, on 27 February 1959, you were convicted by SCM of The punishment imposed was reduction to - absence from your appointed place of duty and were sentenced to hard labor for 35 days. concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your discharge given your frequent misconduct, which resulted in nine NJPs and two court-martial convictions, and since your conduct average was...